The Luddites were literally working class people fighting for their rights against a regime of automation that was supressing their wages in return for a lower quality product.
If a machine is making worse products for consumers, and worse rights for workers, it's 100% right to smash it.
If a machine is making worse products for consumers, and worse rights for workers, it's 100% right to smash it.
December 1, 2025 at 12:30 AM
The Luddites were literally working class people fighting for their rights against a regime of automation that was supressing their wages in return for a lower quality product.
If a machine is making worse products for consumers, and worse rights for workers, it's 100% right to smash it.
If a machine is making worse products for consumers, and worse rights for workers, it's 100% right to smash it.
Why? Because they're correctly calling Telegraph Journalists "Tory Scum"
The Telegraph is a vile racist rag, and it's journalists should be hounded out of public life.
The Telegraph is a vile racist rag, and it's journalists should be hounded out of public life.
November 29, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Why? Because they're correctly calling Telegraph Journalists "Tory Scum"
The Telegraph is a vile racist rag, and it's journalists should be hounded out of public life.
The Telegraph is a vile racist rag, and it's journalists should be hounded out of public life.
His environmental advocacy was deeply misinformed, based on aesthetics over substance and was realistically only a few steps away from Conservative rhetoric about how rural farmers are the real environmentalists.
November 21, 2025 at 8:37 AM
His environmental advocacy was deeply misinformed, based on aesthetics over substance and was realistically only a few steps away from Conservative rhetoric about how rural farmers are the real environmentalists.
No actually, Steve Irwin has plenty reason to be disliked.
He frequently dismissed enivornmental concerns about overgrazing and habitat destruction at the hands of cattle ranching - And advocated for a form of "environmentalism" that involved more grazing land.
He frequently dismissed enivornmental concerns about overgrazing and habitat destruction at the hands of cattle ranching - And advocated for a form of "environmentalism" that involved more grazing land.
November 21, 2025 at 8:36 AM
No actually, Steve Irwin has plenty reason to be disliked.
He frequently dismissed enivornmental concerns about overgrazing and habitat destruction at the hands of cattle ranching - And advocated for a form of "environmentalism" that involved more grazing land.
He frequently dismissed enivornmental concerns about overgrazing and habitat destruction at the hands of cattle ranching - And advocated for a form of "environmentalism" that involved more grazing land.
The Feds tell people to use signal because they're jealous that the Chinese Government gets all that juicy data.
"With surveillance capabilities" - Yeah welcome to surveillance capitalism, next
"Mind-numbing" - Are you one of those "TikTok is digital opiate" conspiracy theorists?
"With surveillance capabilities" - Yeah welcome to surveillance capitalism, next
"Mind-numbing" - Are you one of those "TikTok is digital opiate" conspiracy theorists?
September 2, 2025 at 5:33 PM
The Feds tell people to use signal because they're jealous that the Chinese Government gets all that juicy data.
"With surveillance capabilities" - Yeah welcome to surveillance capitalism, next
"Mind-numbing" - Are you one of those "TikTok is digital opiate" conspiracy theorists?
"With surveillance capabilities" - Yeah welcome to surveillance capitalism, next
"Mind-numbing" - Are you one of those "TikTok is digital opiate" conspiracy theorists?
"Perhaps the offices they established in New York had some other purposes" - Like helping people sort out drivers licenses and other legal operations that they openly advertised themselves as doing?
"That had yet to be utilized" - Sure, lets blindly speculate about countries we dislike.
"That had yet to be utilized" - Sure, lets blindly speculate about countries we dislike.
September 2, 2025 at 5:32 PM
"Perhaps the offices they established in New York had some other purposes" - Like helping people sort out drivers licenses and other legal operations that they openly advertised themselves as doing?
"That had yet to be utilized" - Sure, lets blindly speculate about countries we dislike.
"That had yet to be utilized" - Sure, lets blindly speculate about countries we dislike.
"Less scrupulous rival"
You should have just said this from the beggining tbh.
You consider, against all evidence, China to be less scrupulous than the US - And therefore go out of your way to consider it worse when China is doing it.
You should have just said this from the beggining tbh.
You consider, against all evidence, China to be less scrupulous than the US - And therefore go out of your way to consider it worse when China is doing it.
September 2, 2025 at 5:31 PM
"Less scrupulous rival"
You should have just said this from the beggining tbh.
You consider, against all evidence, China to be less scrupulous than the US - And therefore go out of your way to consider it worse when China is doing it.
You should have just said this from the beggining tbh.
You consider, against all evidence, China to be less scrupulous than the US - And therefore go out of your way to consider it worse when China is doing it.
Reading this article, it sounds like they just made fake social media accounts to say mean thing about the dissidents.
So let's get this straight. If you're a Chinese Dissident abroad they say mean things about you online.
Meanwhile the US fucking extradites you.
So let's get this straight. If you're a Chinese Dissident abroad they say mean things about you online.
Meanwhile the US fucking extradites you.
September 2, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Reading this article, it sounds like they just made fake social media accounts to say mean thing about the dissidents.
So let's get this straight. If you're a Chinese Dissident abroad they say mean things about you online.
Meanwhile the US fucking extradites you.
So let's get this straight. If you're a Chinese Dissident abroad they say mean things about you online.
Meanwhile the US fucking extradites you.
"Doesn't mean they aren't a threat"
If they do nothing to me whatsoever, why are they a threat?
What is my beef meant to be with China? I know what my beef with the West is, but have no idea what my beef with China is meant to be.
If they do nothing to me whatsoever, why are they a threat?
What is my beef meant to be with China? I know what my beef with the West is, but have no idea what my beef with China is meant to be.
September 2, 2025 at 5:09 PM
"Doesn't mean they aren't a threat"
If they do nothing to me whatsoever, why are they a threat?
What is my beef meant to be with China? I know what my beef with the West is, but have no idea what my beef with China is meant to be.
If they do nothing to me whatsoever, why are they a threat?
What is my beef meant to be with China? I know what my beef with the West is, but have no idea what my beef with China is meant to be.
The only difference in my mind is that Britain and Australia actively work with the US and so extradite political prisoners to there.
Whereas this is done illegally, and the victims therefore have actual recourse beyond being sieged in embassies.
Whereas this is done illegally, and the victims therefore have actual recourse beyond being sieged in embassies.
September 2, 2025 at 5:08 PM
The only difference in my mind is that Britain and Australia actively work with the US and so extradite political prisoners to there.
Whereas this is done illegally, and the victims therefore have actual recourse beyond being sieged in embassies.
Whereas this is done illegally, and the victims therefore have actual recourse beyond being sieged in embassies.
How many people did they actually detain?
Also, if these people were criminals or dissidents in China, isn't it kinda like a Julian Assange situation? Except Julian Assange was actually at higher risk and not able to leave the embassy.
IDK, you're in favour of policing, you tell me.
Also, if these people were criminals or dissidents in China, isn't it kinda like a Julian Assange situation? Except Julian Assange was actually at higher risk and not able to leave the embassy.
IDK, you're in favour of policing, you tell me.
September 2, 2025 at 5:06 PM
How many people did they actually detain?
Also, if these people were criminals or dissidents in China, isn't it kinda like a Julian Assange situation? Except Julian Assange was actually at higher risk and not able to leave the embassy.
IDK, you're in favour of policing, you tell me.
Also, if these people were criminals or dissidents in China, isn't it kinda like a Julian Assange situation? Except Julian Assange was actually at higher risk and not able to leave the embassy.
IDK, you're in favour of policing, you tell me.
If China was harrassing me it would be criminal and I could rightly complain to my government.
Yet my government openly let US government agents stalk me and retrieve my details from courts aboard that should have no jurisdiction over me and it's 100% legal for them to do so.
Yet my government openly let US government agents stalk me and retrieve my details from courts aboard that should have no jurisdiction over me and it's 100% legal for them to do so.
September 2, 2025 at 5:00 PM
If China was harrassing me it would be criminal and I could rightly complain to my government.
Yet my government openly let US government agents stalk me and retrieve my details from courts aboard that should have no jurisdiction over me and it's 100% legal for them to do so.
Yet my government openly let US government agents stalk me and retrieve my details from courts aboard that should have no jurisdiction over me and it's 100% legal for them to do so.
If these supposed "Secret Police Stations" were actually carrying out hostile actions against non-Chinese civilians, it would be front page news.
Plus, people are actually arrested for it.
Because of the Five Eyes Alliance, no American was arrested for the US State harrassing me.
Plus, people are actually arrested for it.
Because of the Five Eyes Alliance, no American was arrested for the US State harrassing me.
September 2, 2025 at 4:59 PM
If these supposed "Secret Police Stations" were actually carrying out hostile actions against non-Chinese civilians, it would be front page news.
Plus, people are actually arrested for it.
Because of the Five Eyes Alliance, no American was arrested for the US State harrassing me.
Plus, people are actually arrested for it.
Because of the Five Eyes Alliance, no American was arrested for the US State harrassing me.
Typically if you've never been to China, China leaves you alone.
Meanwhile, if you've never been to the US, that doesn't stop them from demanding your government hand over information about yourself, and then sending police to intimidate you.
Meanwhile, if you've never been to the US, that doesn't stop them from demanding your government hand over information about yourself, and then sending police to intimidate you.
September 2, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Typically if you've never been to China, China leaves you alone.
Meanwhile, if you've never been to the US, that doesn't stop them from demanding your government hand over information about yourself, and then sending police to intimidate you.
Meanwhile, if you've never been to the US, that doesn't stop them from demanding your government hand over information about yourself, and then sending police to intimidate you.
China has never demanded my details in a district court, and then abused information sharing priveleges to get information about me, who doesn't even live in their country.
China has never sent policemen round my door to read out a statement to me depsite me not even living there.
The US has.
China has never sent policemen round my door to read out a statement to me depsite me not even living there.
The US has.
September 2, 2025 at 4:47 PM
China has never demanded my details in a district court, and then abused information sharing priveleges to get information about me, who doesn't even live in their country.
China has never sent policemen round my door to read out a statement to me depsite me not even living there.
The US has.
China has never sent policemen round my door to read out a statement to me depsite me not even living there.
The US has.
"Similar risk posed by the US is a red herring" - How is China not a red herring?
I am at ZERO risk from the Chinese Government. None
Meanwhile, I'm not even American, yet ICE agents doxxed me and harassed me and sent police to my door for online comments calling them fascists.
I am at ZERO risk from the Chinese Government. None
Meanwhile, I'm not even American, yet ICE agents doxxed me and harassed me and sent police to my door for online comments calling them fascists.
September 2, 2025 at 4:45 PM
"Similar risk posed by the US is a red herring" - How is China not a red herring?
I am at ZERO risk from the Chinese Government. None
Meanwhile, I'm not even American, yet ICE agents doxxed me and harassed me and sent police to my door for online comments calling them fascists.
I am at ZERO risk from the Chinese Government. None
Meanwhile, I'm not even American, yet ICE agents doxxed me and harassed me and sent police to my door for online comments calling them fascists.
I was referring mostly to the bombing campaign in Libya, which destabilised the government, making it a civil war zone to this day, and killed anywhere between dozens and hundreds of civilians.
Orcs support alliances that drop bombs, Real human politicians support defensive alliances only.
Orcs support alliances that drop bombs, Real human politicians support defensive alliances only.
September 2, 2025 at 4:42 PM
I was referring mostly to the bombing campaign in Libya, which destabilised the government, making it a civil war zone to this day, and killed anywhere between dozens and hundreds of civilians.
Orcs support alliances that drop bombs, Real human politicians support defensive alliances only.
Orcs support alliances that drop bombs, Real human politicians support defensive alliances only.
Foreign Policy Positions are literally the most important part of a campaign, they're not a "Hindrance"
And NATO is not a purely defensive alliance. It has engaged in multiple unprovoked bombing campaigns.
We should not be part of alliances that aren't purely defensive.
And NATO is not a purely defensive alliance. It has engaged in multiple unprovoked bombing campaigns.
We should not be part of alliances that aren't purely defensive.
September 2, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Foreign Policy Positions are literally the most important part of a campaign, they're not a "Hindrance"
And NATO is not a purely defensive alliance. It has engaged in multiple unprovoked bombing campaigns.
We should not be part of alliances that aren't purely defensive.
And NATO is not a purely defensive alliance. It has engaged in multiple unprovoked bombing campaigns.
We should not be part of alliances that aren't purely defensive.
You are OPENLY a Canadian
Go dig up another indigenous mass grave you maple leaf Yankee.
Canadians are bloodthirsty orcs incapable of reasoned conversation, only capable of killing indigenous babies.
Go dig up another indigenous mass grave you maple leaf Yankee.
Canadians are bloodthirsty orcs incapable of reasoned conversation, only capable of killing indigenous babies.
September 2, 2025 at 4:15 PM
You are OPENLY a Canadian
Go dig up another indigenous mass grave you maple leaf Yankee.
Canadians are bloodthirsty orcs incapable of reasoned conversation, only capable of killing indigenous babies.
Go dig up another indigenous mass grave you maple leaf Yankee.
Canadians are bloodthirsty orcs incapable of reasoned conversation, only capable of killing indigenous babies.
(This isn't to say Mamdani isn't good in other areas, it's to point out the bankruptcy that comes with running electorally for a bourgeois party)
September 2, 2025 at 11:41 AM
(This isn't to say Mamdani isn't good in other areas, it's to point out the bankruptcy that comes with running electorally for a bourgeois party)
If anything we should be calling out the utter cowardice of people who were advocating for defunding the police years ago, but now that they're running for office are trying to get the police on side.
*cough* Mamdani *cough*
*cough* Mamdani *cough*
September 2, 2025 at 11:41 AM
If anything we should be calling out the utter cowardice of people who were advocating for defunding the police years ago, but now that they're running for office are trying to get the police on side.
*cough* Mamdani *cough*
*cough* Mamdani *cough*
Oh and INB4 "What about the concerns about China getting people's data?"
Unless you're willing to call for every app that the US Government has a backdoor in to be censored too, you're a hypocrite.
For ordinary people in the West, the US Government is more of a threat than the Chinese.
Unless you're willing to call for every app that the US Government has a backdoor in to be censored too, you're a hypocrite.
For ordinary people in the West, the US Government is more of a threat than the Chinese.
September 2, 2025 at 11:23 AM
Oh and INB4 "What about the concerns about China getting people's data?"
Unless you're willing to call for every app that the US Government has a backdoor in to be censored too, you're a hypocrite.
For ordinary people in the West, the US Government is more of a threat than the Chinese.
Unless you're willing to call for every app that the US Government has a backdoor in to be censored too, you're a hypocrite.
For ordinary people in the West, the US Government is more of a threat than the Chinese.