Joe Shoop
@joeshoop.bsky.social
Seattle design person.
A mess of atoms temporarily arranged in the vague shape of a human body.
upleft.com
A mess of atoms temporarily arranged in the vague shape of a human body.
upleft.com
Reposted by Joe Shoop
Lads, if you're not going to allow yourself the vulnerability to feel moved by art, then at least have the decency to be haunted by your profits
May 6, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Lads, if you're not going to allow yourself the vulnerability to feel moved by art, then at least have the decency to be haunted by your profits
Is this an entire business centered on a reference to a 3 season show from 50 years ago?
February 12, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Is this an entire business centered on a reference to a 3 season show from 50 years ago?
One thing I love about the studio display is that on video calls, voices come through the monitor at the same volume the person was speaking.
January 31, 2025 at 9:06 PM
One thing I love about the studio display is that on video calls, voices come through the monitor at the same volume the person was speaking.
I think it’s to allow a check for things like 2fa or passwordless login methods like FaceID or Passkeys.
Bummer that it complicates the login process for everybody, especially if you’re using a password manager.
Bummer that it complicates the login process for everybody, especially if you’re using a password manager.
January 24, 2025 at 4:40 PM
I think it’s to allow a check for things like 2fa or passwordless login methods like FaceID or Passkeys.
Bummer that it complicates the login process for everybody, especially if you’re using a password manager.
Bummer that it complicates the login process for everybody, especially if you’re using a password manager.
Don’t make me add Cheeto to my blocklist.
January 20, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Don’t make me add Cheeto to my blocklist.
.zeldman[data-*=“birthday”] {
content:”Happy Birthday!”;
background: url(“balloons.gif”);
}
content:”Happy Birthday!”;
background: url(“balloons.gif”);
}
January 13, 2025 at 3:56 PM
.zeldman[data-*=“birthday”] {
content:”Happy Birthday!”;
background: url(“balloons.gif”);
}
content:”Happy Birthday!”;
background: url(“balloons.gif”);
}
This is exactly the kind of pointlessly argumentative post he is talking about. You are the problem.
January 10, 2025 at 5:35 PM
This is exactly the kind of pointlessly argumentative post he is talking about. You are the problem.
Nice! Looks like this just got enough support to become a viable option within the last year.
January 7, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Nice! Looks like this just got enough support to become a viable option within the last year.
Was a fan of the color functions. Being able to adjust lightness or saturation on a color allowed for some cool stuff.
Like being able to lighten a color by 10% for a hover, or using a darker shade of a background color for a border.
Like being able to lighten a color by 10% for a hover, or using a darker shade of a background color for a border.
January 7, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Was a fan of the color functions. Being able to adjust lightness or saturation on a color allowed for some cool stuff.
Like being able to lighten a color by 10% for a hover, or using a darker shade of a background color for a border.
Like being able to lighten a color by 10% for a hover, or using a darker shade of a background color for a border.
There is a camera passthrough that creates the illusion you can see the background, but it is entirely through a screen.
January 2, 2025 at 11:52 PM
There is a camera passthrough that creates the illusion you can see the background, but it is entirely through a screen.
I just want him to play a young Steve Buscemi
January 2, 2025 at 6:36 PM
I just want him to play a young Steve Buscemi
VR goggles will never have mass appeal like a device you can glance at while doing other things.
January 2, 2025 at 6:29 PM
VR goggles will never have mass appeal like a device you can glance at while doing other things.
All I've blocked so far is two last names, I bet you can guess which ones.
December 31, 2024 at 1:13 AM
All I've blocked so far is two last names, I bet you can guess which ones.
A L I E N : F U C K
December 27, 2024 at 6:51 AM
A L I E N : F U C K
As is the claim of non-inevitability.
December 24, 2024 at 8:57 PM
As is the claim of non-inevitability.
You know just as much about the future as I do, which is nothing.
The only kind of proof one can make about an unrealized outcome is with rationalizations.
The only kind of proof one can make about an unrealized outcome is with rationalizations.
December 24, 2024 at 8:24 PM
You know just as much about the future as I do, which is nothing.
The only kind of proof one can make about an unrealized outcome is with rationalizations.
The only kind of proof one can make about an unrealized outcome is with rationalizations.
People had the same sentiment about computers, the internet, cell phones, smart phones, etc.
You can get by without those things, but the world changes even if you choose to stand still.
You can get by without those things, but the world changes even if you choose to stand still.
December 24, 2024 at 6:07 PM
People had the same sentiment about computers, the internet, cell phones, smart phones, etc.
You can get by without those things, but the world changes even if you choose to stand still.
You can get by without those things, but the world changes even if you choose to stand still.
Inevitable only means that a thing can’t be stopped, not that it is all-consuming.
Inevitable in the sense that even if you don’t use it, other people will.
Inevitable in the sense that even if you don’t use it, other people will.
December 24, 2024 at 5:14 PM
Inevitable only means that a thing can’t be stopped, not that it is all-consuming.
Inevitable in the sense that even if you don’t use it, other people will.
Inevitable in the sense that even if you don’t use it, other people will.
My aim is to be objective and realistic about the future.
AI is loaded full of ethical problems from all angles. We should be extremely critical of it, and we should object to it's use in specific ways.
I don't think "AI is bad, I don't want it, get it away" is a very nuanced or useful take.
AI is loaded full of ethical problems from all angles. We should be extremely critical of it, and we should object to it's use in specific ways.
I don't think "AI is bad, I don't want it, get it away" is a very nuanced or useful take.
December 23, 2024 at 9:38 PM
My aim is to be objective and realistic about the future.
AI is loaded full of ethical problems from all angles. We should be extremely critical of it, and we should object to it's use in specific ways.
I don't think "AI is bad, I don't want it, get it away" is a very nuanced or useful take.
AI is loaded full of ethical problems from all angles. We should be extremely critical of it, and we should object to it's use in specific ways.
I don't think "AI is bad, I don't want it, get it away" is a very nuanced or useful take.
"We can't make it not exist" points pretty directly back at the inevitability, no?
December 23, 2024 at 9:19 PM
"We can't make it not exist" points pretty directly back at the inevitability, no?
Lol you're the one that first used the word in this thread, and now you're really stretching the definition.
To be clear, my argument is that AI exists, that we can't make it not exist, and that people use tools they find useful.
To be clear, my argument is that AI exists, that we can't make it not exist, and that people use tools they find useful.
December 23, 2024 at 8:54 PM
Lol you're the one that first used the word in this thread, and now you're really stretching the definition.
To be clear, my argument is that AI exists, that we can't make it not exist, and that people use tools they find useful.
To be clear, my argument is that AI exists, that we can't make it not exist, and that people use tools they find useful.
Common. Typical. Usual. It implies that there are exceptions. That it is not a universal.
December 23, 2024 at 8:45 PM
Common. Typical. Usual. It implies that there are exceptions. That it is not a universal.