Jean-Marc Schlenker
@jmschlenker.bsky.social
Mathematician, interested in science, technology and science policy.
Let me venture a hypothesis: Trump is doing what he would do in a negotiation, and putting expectations as low as possible. So he starts with repulsive idiots or criminals like Gaetz or Gabbard, so that he can later get through merely incompetent or corrupt people on top positions.
November 25, 2024 at 8:29 PM
Let me venture a hypothesis: Trump is doing what he would do in a negotiation, and putting expectations as low as possible. So he starts with repulsive idiots or criminals like Gaetz or Gabbard, so that he can later get through merely incompetent or corrupt people on top positions.
- we don't know how to predict them,
-they would have a systemic, deep and long-lasting effect on us, in particular on our power grid, communication networks, and other key infrastructure, with a cost estimate in the 10^12 $ (2/2)
-they would have a systemic, deep and long-lasting effect on us, in particular on our power grid, communication networks, and other key infrastructure, with a cost estimate in the 10^12 $ (2/2)
November 24, 2024 at 6:12 PM
- we don't know how to predict them,
-they would have a systemic, deep and long-lasting effect on us, in particular on our power grid, communication networks, and other key infrastructure, with a cost estimate in the 10^12 $ (2/2)
-they would have a systemic, deep and long-lasting effect on us, in particular on our power grid, communication networks, and other key infrastructure, with a cost estimate in the 10^12 $ (2/2)
One could imagine to see in science and technology a new split between East and West, similar to that between the Soviet Union and the west until the early nineties.
November 24, 2024 at 6:10 PM
One could imagine to see in science and technology a new split between East and West, similar to that between the Soviet Union and the west until the early nineties.
By the way, I don't really believe in their claim -- it all depends on the quality of their automated reviewer.
November 24, 2024 at 5:40 PM
By the way, I don't really believe in their claim -- it all depends on the quality of their automated reviewer.
"[...] we design and validate an automated reviewer, which we show achieves near-human performance in evaluating paper scores. The AI Scientist can produce papers that exceed the acceptance threshold at a top machine learning conference as judged by our automated reviewer."
November 24, 2024 at 5:38 PM
"[...] we design and validate an automated reviewer, which we show achieves near-human performance in evaluating paper scores. The AI Scientist can produce papers that exceed the acceptance threshold at a top machine learning conference as judged by our automated reviewer."