1L in TE & TIE for NDMM
🔑 SUMMARY🔑
🎯Triplet WAS standard approach, but quad is🆕SOC
🎉Quad is preferred 1L for TE NDMM v triplet
🆕SOC: IsaRVd for TIE NDMM🎉
🎯MRD- emerging as a benchmark in🔬 & clin decision making
👏Great news for pts
& Don't forget to claim #CME > bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Post
1L in TE & TIE for NDMM
🔑 SUMMARY🔑
🎯Triplet WAS standard approach, but quad is🆕SOC
🎉Quad is preferred 1L for TE NDMM v triplet
🆕SOC: IsaRVd for TIE NDMM🎉
🎯MRD- emerging as a benchmark in🔬 & clin decision making
👏Great news for pts
& Don't forget to claim #CME > bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Post
Post 1L, no 🔼 in MRD- rates for all pts
Tailoring tx to MRD post 1L may not ➡️ MRD-
If respond to 1L tx may not need tandem SCT to reach MRD-; cont anti-CD38 &PI
🤔High # pts w t(11;14): impact time to MRD- results?
Post 1L, no 🔼 in MRD- rates for all pts
Tailoring tx to MRD post 1L may not ➡️ MRD-
If respond to 1L tx may not need tandem SCT to reach MRD-; cont anti-CD38 &PI
🤔High # pts w t(11;14): impact time to MRD- results?
🔬CEPHEUS
🔬IMROZ
🔬GMMG-CONCEPT
🔬ADVANCE…
🥅 MRD negativity emerges as benchmark to create a level playing field
Across🔬, regimens, & now✅ FDA approved as clinical trial endpoint April ‘25
🔬CEPHEUS
🔬IMROZ
🔬GMMG-CONCEPT
🔬ADVANCE…
🥅 MRD negativity emerges as benchmark to create a level playing field
Across🔬, regimens, & now✅ FDA approved as clinical trial endpoint April ‘25
↑MRD- rate: 59% v 36%, adjOR = 2.5; P<0.0007➡️ 2.5x ↑MRD- rate w/DKRd
👉No new safety concerns
❓Impact on EFS, PFS & OS TBD
DKRd👉1L for all pts on KRd backbone regardless of TE status
↑MRD- rate: 59% v 36%, adjOR = 2.5; P<0.0007➡️ 2.5x ↑MRD- rate w/DKRd
👉No new safety concerns
❓Impact on EFS, PFS & OS TBD
DKRd👉1L for all pts on KRd backbone regardless of TE status
73.2% MRD- post-consolidatn; p=1.91x10-13
86.8% MRD- @ any time
58.4% MRD- ≥CR
40.6% retained ≥2yr sust MRD-
Med follow-up: 43m(0-90.2m)
mPFS: 72.8m
5yr OS: 72%
6yr OS: 69%
⬆️2yr sustMRD-, ⬆️PFS, 69% OS @ 6yr
IsaKRd:🆕SOC for HRNDMM
73.2% MRD- post-consolidatn; p=1.91x10-13
86.8% MRD- @ any time
58.4% MRD- ≥CR
40.6% retained ≥2yr sust MRD-
Med follow-up: 43m(0-90.2m)
mPFS: 72.8m
5yr OS: 72%
6yr OS: 69%
⬆️2yr sustMRD-, ⬆️PFS, 69% OS @ 6yr
IsaKRd:🆕SOC for HRNDMM
GMMG-CONCEPT, largest cohort to eval MRD- in TE & TIE HRNDMM
IsaKRd inductn & consolidatn➡️IsaKR maint➡️
↑MRD- rate: 67.7% in TE & 54.2% in TIE
Sustained ≥1yr: 62.6% in TE & 46.2% in TIE
🎉IsaKRd➡️↑deep remissions
GMMG-CONCEPT, largest cohort to eval MRD- in TE & TIE HRNDMM
IsaKRd inductn & consolidatn➡️IsaKR maint➡️
↑MRD- rate: 67.7% in TE & 54.2% in TIE
Sustained ≥1yr: 62.6% in TE & 46.2% in TIE
🎉IsaKRd➡️↑deep remissions
💬 reply/comment w/ your answer 💬
1️⃣ Initiate allogeneic SCT
2️⃣ Choose IV instead of subQ
3️⃣ Treat to MRD- then d/c tx
4️⃣ Treat to MRD- & cont maintenance
💬 reply/comment w/ your answer 💬
1️⃣ Initiate allogeneic SCT
2️⃣ Choose IV instead of subQ
3️⃣ Treat to MRD- then d/c tx
4️⃣ Treat to MRD- & cont maintenance
IsaVRd➡️IsaVR➡️IsaR v IsaRd➡️IsaR➡️IsaR
↑MRD- rate @
12mo 51% v 21%; OR: 3.88; 95%CI: 2.27-6.62;P<0.0001
18mo 53% v 26%; OR: 3.16; 95%CI: 1.89-5.28;P<0.0001
🔑Wkly V in IsaRd=deep responses
Supports IsaVRd as🆕SOC for TIE NDMM
IsaVRd➡️IsaVR➡️IsaR v IsaRd➡️IsaR➡️IsaR
↑MRD- rate @
12mo 51% v 21%; OR: 3.88; 95%CI: 2.27-6.62;P<0.0001
18mo 53% v 26%; OR: 3.16; 95%CI: 1.89-5.28;P<0.0001
🔑Wkly V in IsaRd=deep responses
Supports IsaVRd as🆕SOC for TIE NDMM
IMROZ🔑trial
IsaVRd ➡️ IsaRd v VRd ➡️ Rd in TIE pts w NDMM
👉IsaVRd ➡️↓time to MRD-: 14.7 v 32.8m
👉↑ PFS @ 60m: 63.2 v 45.2%; HR: 0.60; P<0.001
👉↑ CR: 74.7% v 64.1%; P=0.01
IMROZ results support IsaVRd as 🎉 🆕 SOC for TIE #NDMM pts
IMROZ🔑trial
IsaVRd ➡️ IsaRd v VRd ➡️ Rd in TIE pts w NDMM
👉IsaVRd ➡️↓time to MRD-: 14.7 v 32.8m
👉↑ PFS @ 60m: 63.2 v 45.2%; HR: 0.60; P<0.001
👉↑ CR: 74.7% v 64.1%; P=0.01
IMROZ results support IsaVRd as 🎉 🆕 SOC for TIE #NDMM pts
DVRd ➡️ deeper, more durable MRD- rate
TIE cohort:
👉Overall MRD- 63.2 v 41.4%
👉Sustained MRD @ ≥12m 48.7 v 26.3%; P<0.0001
👉CR 81.2 v 61.6%; P<0.0001
👉HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.79; P=0.0005
↓D/C rate w quad
🎉DVRd new SOC for TIE NDMM🎉
DVRd ➡️ deeper, more durable MRD- rate
TIE cohort:
👉Overall MRD- 63.2 v 41.4%
👉Sustained MRD @ ≥12m 48.7 v 26.3%; P<0.0001
👉CR 81.2 v 61.6%; P<0.0001
👉HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.79; P=0.0005
↓D/C rate w quad
🎉DVRd new SOC for TIE NDMM🎉
The DVRd arm demonstrated which of the following outcomes?
💬 REPLY👇
1️⃣ Deep, more durable MRD-
2️⃣ ⬆️MRD- rates. No🔺in PFS
3️⃣ Similar efficacy, ⬆️VTE
4️⃣ ⬆️ D/C rate in DVRd arm
The DVRd arm demonstrated which of the following outcomes?
💬 REPLY👇
1️⃣ Deep, more durable MRD-
2️⃣ ⬆️MRD- rates. No🔺in PFS
3️⃣ Similar efficacy, ⬆️VTE
4️⃣ ⬆️ D/C rate in DVRd arm
↑CR 43.5% w IsaVRd v 34% w VRd
↑MRD- rate 66.2% w quad v 47.7% w triplet
👉PFS at 3yr benefit: 83% v 75% w/IsaVRd v VRd
↑MRD- regardless of maint v MRD+ (HR 0.61; P=0.002)
🔮Maintenance w Isa-len v len is on-going
↑CR 43.5% w IsaVRd v 34% w VRd
↑MRD- rate 66.2% w quad v 47.7% w triplet
👉PFS at 3yr benefit: 83% v 75% w/IsaVRd v VRd
↑MRD- regardless of maint v MRD+ (HR 0.61; P=0.002)
🔮Maintenance w Isa-len v len is on-going
GMMG-HD7: IsaVRd v VRd induction ➡️ isa-len v len maintenance in TE NDMM
👉↑ MRD- rate 50% v 36%; p =0.00017
👉IsaVRd had ↓AE rates & ↓d/c rates v RVd
🎉🆕 SOC
👉Results ➡️ addition of IsaVRd as induction regimen for TE NDMM
GMMG-HD7: IsaVRd v VRd induction ➡️ isa-len v len maintenance in TE NDMM
👉↑ MRD- rate 50% v 36%; p =0.00017
👉IsaVRd had ↓AE rates & ↓d/c rates v RVd
🎉🆕 SOC
👉Results ➡️ addition of IsaVRd as induction regimen for TE NDMM
👉 ↑ sustMRD- at ≥24m w DVRd v VRd: 55.8 v 22.6%
👉 Pts w ≥12m sustMRD-: ↑ 48m PFS, regardless of tx
👉 Only 3.1% progression at 18m w DVRd v 6.8% VRd
🔑 DVRd ➡️ 2.5x ⬆️ ≥24m sustMRD- & ½ progression risk at ≤18m tx
👉 ↑ sustMRD- at ≥24m w DVRd v VRd: 55.8 v 22.6%
👉 Pts w ≥12m sustMRD-: ↑ 48m PFS, regardless of tx
👉 Only 3.1% progression at 18m w DVRd v 6.8% VRd
🔑 DVRd ➡️ 2.5x ⬆️ ≥24m sustMRD- & ½ progression risk at ≤18m tx
Let’s look @ the📈 on quad tx
PERSEUS ~🔑 trial: SQ dara➕VRd ➡️ ↑outcomes in TE pts
👉↑PFS @ 48m 84.3 v 67.7%; HR: 0.42; P<0.001
👉↑MRD- rate 75.2 v 47.5%; P<0.001
👉↑CR rate 87.9 v 70.1%; P<0.001
🎉 🆕 SOC ~ quad instead of triplet 🎉
Let’s look @ the📈 on quad tx
PERSEUS ~🔑 trial: SQ dara➕VRd ➡️ ↑outcomes in TE pts
👉↑PFS @ 48m 84.3 v 67.7%; HR: 0.42; P<0.001
👉↑MRD- rate 75.2 v 47.5%; P<0.001
👉↑CR rate 87.9 v 70.1%; P<0.001
🎉 🆕 SOC ~ quad instead of triplet 🎉
1️⃣📖#CME info bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-CME
2️⃣Take the pre-survey 👉bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Pre
3️⃣Get the latest NDMM quad tx efficacy data w/ 🧵👇
4️⃣🏆Claim🆓CME bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Post
Now, let's get started!
1️⃣📖#CME info bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-CME
2️⃣Take the pre-survey 👉bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Pre
3️⃣Get the latest NDMM quad tx efficacy data w/ 🧵👇
4️⃣🏆Claim🆓CME bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Post
Now, let's get started!