John M. Cunningham
@jmcunning.bsky.social
Editor and fact-checker | Chicago
He was replying to her tweets as early as March 2011. She'd turned 18 two months before that. xcancel.com/search?f=twe...
November 18, 2025 at 11:11 PM
He was replying to her tweets as early as March 2011. She'd turned 18 two months before that. xcancel.com/search?f=twe...
In 2009 she tweeted that Andy Dick's drag character Daphne Aguilera was "basically the reason why I make Pop music."
November 18, 2025 at 9:08 PM
In 2009 she tweeted that Andy Dick's drag character Daphne Aguilera was "basically the reason why I make Pop music."
Still a lot of "not sure" among independents: today.yougov.com/politics/art...
November 18, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Still a lot of "not sure" among independents: today.yougov.com/politics/art...
We'll just have to imagine
November 18, 2025 at 7:46 PM
We'll just have to imagine
And also clear that she posted as @Livvypop on Twitter in 2009-11
November 18, 2025 at 7:00 PM
And also clear that she posted as @Livvypop on Twitter in 2009-11
"Electro Lolita"
November 18, 2025 at 6:08 PM
"Electro Lolita"
It's her. web.archive.org/web/20090502...
November 18, 2025 at 5:56 PM
It's her. web.archive.org/web/20090502...
November 18, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Right, the author of that piece (Mariame Kaba) doesn't even identify as a Democrat. theintercept.com/2020/03/19/o...
November 15, 2025 at 4:09 AM
Right, the author of that piece (Mariame Kaba) doesn't even identify as a Democrat. theintercept.com/2020/03/19/o...
Damn. Including two legendary anchor duos.
November 14, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Damn. Including two legendary anchor duos.
The former president of Harvard and secretary of the Treasury
November 12, 2025 at 9:22 PM
The former president of Harvard and secretary of the Treasury
No, you're right. ("Conclusion" was misleading; I didn't mean it was the literal end of the article.) Here's that graf:
November 10, 2025 at 6:47 PM
No, you're right. ("Conclusion" was misleading; I didn't mean it was the literal end of the article.) Here's that graf:
Sure, he is explaining their thinking, but he does not himself accept that it is good. To the contrary, this is his conclusion:
November 10, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Sure, he is explaining their thinking, but he does not himself accept that it is good. To the contrary, this is his conclusion:
Dave Brat Summer
November 10, 2025 at 3:05 AM
Dave Brat Summer
It's emblematic of broad issues in the information environment, so I definitely think it's worth covering. He didn't say this example was more important than others. In fact, he goes out of his way to say that it's trivial (but nevertheless telling).
November 7, 2025 at 2:14 PM
It's emblematic of broad issues in the information environment, so I definitely think it's worth covering. He didn't say this example was more important than others. In fact, he goes out of his way to say that it's trivial (but nevertheless telling).
I know this is probably a targeted ad via Google, but it is darkly funny to me that the NYT is promoting Manufacturing Consent in the middle of an opinion column.
November 7, 2025 at 2:01 PM
I know this is probably a targeted ad via Google, but it is darkly funny to me that the NYT is promoting Manufacturing Consent in the middle of an opinion column.
Better source: www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10...
November 6, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Better source: www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10...
I don't think it's actually him :(
November 6, 2025 at 12:57 AM
I don't think it's actually him :(
I mean he also said that explicitly
November 5, 2025 at 11:28 PM
I mean he also said that explicitly
