@jmckeeota.bsky.social
I'm reading Karl Popper's 1945 book "The Open Society and Its Enemies." In it, he references the Paradox of Democracy, that is, the possibility that a majority may decide that a tyrant should rule.
In other words, what if the public, through democratic means, empower a tyrant?
In other words, what if the public, through democratic means, empower a tyrant?
June 22, 2025 at 3:33 AM
I'm reading Karl Popper's 1945 book "The Open Society and Its Enemies." In it, he references the Paradox of Democracy, that is, the possibility that a majority may decide that a tyrant should rule.
In other words, what if the public, through democratic means, empower a tyrant?
In other words, what if the public, through democratic means, empower a tyrant?
This blind and careless red-flagging of science spending is demonizing important research. And pretending inequity along class, race, and gender lines don't exist limits the ability to study that inequity.
By cutting off Science's limbs, society is left perpetually ignorant.
By cutting off Science's limbs, society is left perpetually ignorant.
May 26, 2025 at 7:14 PM
This blind and careless red-flagging of science spending is demonizing important research. And pretending inequity along class, race, and gender lines don't exist limits the ability to study that inequity.
By cutting off Science's limbs, society is left perpetually ignorant.
By cutting off Science's limbs, society is left perpetually ignorant.