That said, I feel safe in saying that ∃(Top Zamboni) ⇒ ∃(Top Snowplow)
If I, as not-that-much-of-a-hockey-person can tell the diff between an OK Zamboni and Top Zamboni on such a bounded environment, the spread between an OK Snowplow and Top Snowplow must be even wider.
That said, I feel safe in saying that ∃(Top Zamboni) ⇒ ∃(Top Snowplow)
If I, as not-that-much-of-a-hockey-person can tell the diff between an OK Zamboni and Top Zamboni on such a bounded environment, the spread between an OK Snowplow and Top Snowplow must be even wider.
Top Snowplow.
Top Snowplow.
Perfect overlaps, speed and precision, would cover a rink in the most optimal way for the conditions, and do Zamboni art during a run if they had time. Top Zamboni.
Perfect overlaps, speed and precision, would cover a rink in the most optimal way for the conditions, and do Zamboni art during a run if they had time. Top Zamboni.
Never read the book or even the Wikipedia article.
(He was the sort to claim deep authoritative knowledge on a topic … after reading a bunch of webpages without sources or maybe one book.)
Never read the book or even the Wikipedia article.
(He was the sort to claim deep authoritative knowledge on a topic … after reading a bunch of webpages without sources or maybe one book.)
I guess what I’m getting at is people do have reasons besides “boredom” not to engage with a dashboard - such as active (perhaps even antagonistic) disinterest in what the dashboard presents.
I guess what I’m getting at is people do have reasons besides “boredom” not to engage with a dashboard - such as active (perhaps even antagonistic) disinterest in what the dashboard presents.
It’s not that the info presented isn’t actionable - it’s that some/many/most actively don’t want to do anything about it and actively ignore it until I force them to look at it.
🤷🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
It’s not that the info presented isn’t actionable - it’s that some/many/most actively don’t want to do anything about it and actively ignore it until I force them to look at it.
🤷🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️