3 - We will notify authors if they are invited to submit a paper for full review by Oct. Full manuscripts (which could be RRs) would then be sent out for full review after submission.

2- If you look at the proposal survey, you'll see it is just the idea and rationale for a paper, not the level of detail for review of an AA. The proposal will only be reviewed by me (with feedback from AMPPS as needed) for fit to the call.

1 - The call is for a particular area of research that is not typically an emphasis at AMPPS, though one could be submitted through the regular channels and would be considered. The purpose of the call is to inspire and motivate a research emphasis we haven't seen many submissions on.

I see what you are doing here and I support it.

Thanks for sharing this! Did you see that I'm leading a call for papers at AMPPS to encourage this kind of work? Can forward to you would be great if you could help me share!

It is stupid because the call clearly says there is a fee waiver. You don't have to knock down people's work for your political tirade. APS isn't for profit, but sage is, it isn't as simple and reposting my call for your political crap is just mean. But like Chris said you're clearly too far gone.

you're just an a hole!

I'm showing how often I log in here! The RB HLM textbook data has this and I think you can access various versions similar from the National Center for Educational Statistics in the US.

I actually didn’t know that! I wonder if it’s just a matter of pitching the idea to the editor.