Trop de haine pour que ça tienne

Exactement! Lamelles = danger pour le néophyte

En évitant ceux à lamelles, ça réduit fortement le risque…
Il reste bolets et cèpes !

This challenge could be repeated 😂
based on mood or surroundings

Rock b6, then Q takes K

Lovely!

Racoon in French is **raton laveur**

*Laveur* means "washer" from the observed behavior of raccoons, which often handle their food near water, giving the impression that they are "washing" it

Always a pleasure to help the french speaking community

Just tag my name and SuperStat JJ 🦸‍♂️ will be there from 🇫🇷 for R💙R💜
😊

Looks like ppl on IV Tx were more severe?

But I agree w you it is not straightforward when you do not practice stat methodology daily.

Because it is around 50% (👀 @ the 95% CI rather than point estimate) this result is perfectly consistant with the similar clinical success (i.e. NI for secondary endpoint).

W Dalba, you avoid central venous access, as u said« which are not risk-free spigot » (quote from my mentor Len Mermel!)

Oh, wow!

The vaccine to this wrong belief is:

Au are talking about the probability for Dalba to be superior to SOC on the DOOR outcome.

Here a paper w nice illustrations academic.oup.com/cid/advance-...

As a poker player, I am well trained to the prob of having the best hand.
Hands w <50% is not good in heads-up @paulsaxmd.bsky.social
Think of the discrimination index for a diagnostic test. The cut-off for the area under the ROC curve to be useful is 50%

Yes.

But the authors also provided efficacy results (secondary outcome) in a more traditional way, i.e. Risk Difference and 95% CI btw the 2 randomized arms, and had computed a NI margin a priori, Albert underpowered😉

It seems they have done all this for ppl who like to keep the door closed

This is was I did & bHIV underestimated the risk of HIV (conservative)
😉👏👍