Missy_jin
@jinmissy.bsky.social
Phd student in NZ
Research interests: corporate sustainability ,carbon performance, carbon management accounting, corporate responsibility
Research interests: corporate sustainability ,carbon performance, carbon management accounting, corporate responsibility
Reposted by Missy_jin
That's why, in my opinion, if you wear a polo, it has to have a little something: a bit of texture or a skipper collar. Or it can be worn underneath a tailored jacket (good tailoring is always good). It can't be that "slim fit chino, golf polo, dress sneaker, fancy sports watch" look.
September 10, 2025 at 12:28 AM
That's why, in my opinion, if you wear a polo, it has to have a little something: a bit of texture or a skipper collar. Or it can be worn underneath a tailored jacket (good tailoring is always good). It can't be that "slim fit chino, golf polo, dress sneaker, fancy sports watch" look.
Reposted by Missy_jin
5/7
But because involution is a consequence of the surge in manufacturing that was itself a response to the post-2021-22 decline in property investment, if this is true, it simply shifts the problem forward, as I explain in a recent CRI piece.
carnegieendowment.org/posts/2025/0...
But because involution is a consequence of the surge in manufacturing that was itself a response to the post-2021-22 decline in property investment, if this is true, it simply shifts the problem forward, as I explain in a recent CRI piece.
carnegieendowment.org/posts/2025/0...
What’s New about Involution?
“Involution” is a new word for an old problem, and without a very different set of policies to rein it in, it is a problem that is likely to persist.
carnegieendowment.org
September 15, 2025 at 5:49 AM
5/7
But because involution is a consequence of the surge in manufacturing that was itself a response to the post-2021-22 decline in property investment, if this is true, it simply shifts the problem forward, as I explain in a recent CRI piece.
carnegieendowment.org/posts/2025/0...
But because involution is a consequence of the surge in manufacturing that was itself a response to the post-2021-22 decline in property investment, if this is true, it simply shifts the problem forward, as I explain in a recent CRI piece.
carnegieendowment.org/posts/2025/0...
Reposted by Missy_jin
6/8
imbalances in countries that choose not to. To put it another way, this is an example of how one country's industrial policies can also become the industrial policies (in reverse) of another country, whether that benefits or harms the latter.
carnegieendowment.org/china-financ...
imbalances in countries that choose not to. To put it another way, this is an example of how one country's industrial policies can also become the industrial policies (in reverse) of another country, whether that benefits or harms the latter.
carnegieendowment.org/china-financ...
Which Country Should Design U.S. Industrial Policy?
The decision Americans must make about industrial policy is whether policies that drive the nature and direction of the U.S. economy should be designed at home or abroad by its trade partners. In a hy...
carnegieendowment.org
July 30, 2025 at 11:58 AM
6/8
imbalances in countries that choose not to. To put it another way, this is an example of how one country's industrial policies can also become the industrial policies (in reverse) of another country, whether that benefits or harms the latter.
carnegieendowment.org/china-financ...
imbalances in countries that choose not to. To put it another way, this is an example of how one country's industrial policies can also become the industrial policies (in reverse) of another country, whether that benefits or harms the latter.
carnegieendowment.org/china-financ...
Reposted by Missy_jin
10/10
In the end, you cannot solve a structural problem through accounting or administrative measures. What we are instead likely to see is greater trade surpluses and rising inventories, with the former being the main way to limit the latter.
In the end, you cannot solve a structural problem through accounting or administrative measures. What we are instead likely to see is greater trade surpluses and rising inventories, with the former being the main way to limit the latter.
July 27, 2025 at 6:26 AM
10/10
In the end, you cannot solve a structural problem through accounting or administrative measures. What we are instead likely to see is greater trade surpluses and rising inventories, with the former being the main way to limit the latter.
In the end, you cannot solve a structural problem through accounting or administrative measures. What we are instead likely to see is greater trade surpluses and rising inventories, with the former being the main way to limit the latter.
He got too much to lose…
June 11, 2025 at 4:09 PM
He got too much to lose…
Reposted by Missy_jin
7/8
Manufacturing represents 27-28% of the Chinese economy, even more than the property sector. This means that anything that hurts manufacturing will be very hard for the rest of the economy to absorb.
Manufacturing represents 27-28% of the Chinese economy, even more than the property sector. This means that anything that hurts manufacturing will be very hard for the rest of the economy to absorb.
May 7, 2025 at 4:31 AM
7/8
Manufacturing represents 27-28% of the Chinese economy, even more than the property sector. This means that anything that hurts manufacturing will be very hard for the rest of the economy to absorb.
Manufacturing represents 27-28% of the Chinese economy, even more than the property sector. This means that anything that hurts manufacturing will be very hard for the rest of the economy to absorb.
Reposted by Missy_jin
8/9
My friends in manufacturing tell me that they are under huge pressure to reduce wages and fire workers, but they're also under a lot of pressure by local governments to show higher growth numbers, and this partly explains why exports continue to rise much faster than imports.
My friends in manufacturing tell me that they are under huge pressure to reduce wages and fire workers, but they're also under a lot of pressure by local governments to show higher growth numbers, and this partly explains why exports continue to rise much faster than imports.
May 9, 2025 at 5:17 AM
8/9
My friends in manufacturing tell me that they are under huge pressure to reduce wages and fire workers, but they're also under a lot of pressure by local governments to show higher growth numbers, and this partly explains why exports continue to rise much faster than imports.
My friends in manufacturing tell me that they are under huge pressure to reduce wages and fire workers, but they're also under a lot of pressure by local governments to show higher growth numbers, and this partly explains why exports continue to rise much faster than imports.
Reposted by Missy_jin
4/4
What is more, the growth in median household income was only 5.0%, which suggests that the poor, who are most likely than the rich to convert income into consumption, received a disproportionately low share of that increase.
www.stats.gov.cn/english/Pres...
What is more, the growth in median household income was only 5.0%, which suggests that the poor, who are most likely than the rich to convert income into consumption, received a disproportionately low share of that increase.
www.stats.gov.cn/english/Pres...
www.stats.gov.cn
April 16, 2025 at 6:21 AM
4/4
What is more, the growth in median household income was only 5.0%, which suggests that the poor, who are most likely than the rich to convert income into consumption, received a disproportionately low share of that increase.
www.stats.gov.cn/english/Pres...
What is more, the growth in median household income was only 5.0%, which suggests that the poor, who are most likely than the rich to convert income into consumption, received a disproportionately low share of that increase.
www.stats.gov.cn/english/Pres...
Reposted by Missy_jin
3/4
The point is that what had seemed like a stable global trading regime was in fact based on an unsustainable dependence of the rest of the world on the willingness of the US (along with the UK and Canada) to exchange ownership of domestic assets for large trade deficits.
The point is that what had seemed like a stable global trading regime was in fact based on an unsustainable dependence of the rest of the world on the willingness of the US (along with the UK and Canada) to exchange ownership of domestic assets for large trade deficits.
April 5, 2025 at 3:17 AM
3/4
The point is that what had seemed like a stable global trading regime was in fact based on an unsustainable dependence of the rest of the world on the willingness of the US (along with the UK and Canada) to exchange ownership of domestic assets for large trade deficits.
The point is that what had seemed like a stable global trading regime was in fact based on an unsustainable dependence of the rest of the world on the willingness of the US (along with the UK and Canada) to exchange ownership of domestic assets for large trade deficits.
Reposted by Missy_jin
7/14
To make matters worse, the new tariffs don't really address the real US problem. One obvious reason is that the tariffs are largely bilateral, and while bilateral imbalances may impress those who don't understand trade and capital flows, they are in fact pretty useless.
To make matters worse, the new tariffs don't really address the real US problem. One obvious reason is that the tariffs are largely bilateral, and while bilateral imbalances may impress those who don't understand trade and capital flows, they are in fact pretty useless.
April 3, 2025 at 3:01 AM
7/14
To make matters worse, the new tariffs don't really address the real US problem. One obvious reason is that the tariffs are largely bilateral, and while bilateral imbalances may impress those who don't understand trade and capital flows, they are in fact pretty useless.
To make matters worse, the new tariffs don't really address the real US problem. One obvious reason is that the tariffs are largely bilateral, and while bilateral imbalances may impress those who don't understand trade and capital flows, they are in fact pretty useless.
Reposted by Missy_jin
"It's difficult to win an argument against an intelligent person. It's impossible to win one against an idiot."
March 5, 2025 at 9:29 PM
"It's difficult to win an argument against an intelligent person. It's impossible to win one against an idiot."
It’s painful to watch things escalating so fast …
March 5, 2025 at 4:34 AM
It’s painful to watch things escalating so fast …
我觉得就是故意的，之前Elon musk 穿个T恤戴个棒球帽进白宫，没看到谁说
March 3, 2025 at 1:20 PM
我觉得就是故意的，之前Elon musk 穿个T恤戴个棒球帽进白宫，没看到谁说
Reposted by Missy_jin
8/8
The global trading system is changing, in ways that may be as dramatic as in the 1930s and the 1970s. The temptation to go back to what used to work in the past may be a strong one, but it's not a sustainable one.
The global trading system is changing, in ways that may be as dramatic as in the 1930s and the 1970s. The temptation to go back to what used to work in the past may be a strong one, but it's not a sustainable one.
February 25, 2025 at 4:40 AM
8/8
The global trading system is changing, in ways that may be as dramatic as in the 1930s and the 1970s. The temptation to go back to what used to work in the past may be a strong one, but it's not a sustainable one.
The global trading system is changing, in ways that may be as dramatic as in the 1930s and the 1970s. The temptation to go back to what used to work in the past may be a strong one, but it's not a sustainable one.