https://jimmyhmiller.com
https://futureofcoding.org/episodes/
jimmyhmiller.com/machine-code...
jimmyhmiller.com/machine-code...
I don't have the answers, but I wrote a long text with some early thoughts: tomasp.net/architecture/
I don't have the answers, but I wrote a long text with some early thoughts: tomasp.net/architecture/
→ dubroy.com/blog/five-c...
Yeah it's kinda goofy, but maybe also useful?
→ dubroy.com/blog/five-c...
Yeah it's kinda goofy, but maybe also useful?
jimmyhmiller.github.io/discovery-co...
jimmyhmiller.github.io/discovery-co...
This paper is fantastic. Both haters and fans of types should read it. If every paper in computer science were as good as this one, this series would have been way easier.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
This paper is fantastic. Both haters and fans of types should read it. If every paper in computer science were as good as this one, this series would have been way easier.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
I said no classics, but I made an exception for this one. It is undoubtably a classic, though one I don't think makes HN lists of papers, nor many CS curricula
Your code does in fact have politics.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
I said no classics, but I made an exception for this one. It is undoubtably a classic, though one I don't think makes HN lists of papers, nor many CS curricula
Your code does in fact have politics.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
For day 21 of advent of papers we are covering a topic completely ignored by software engineering, but crucial to it, Conceptual Engineering. How do we fix our broken concepts? How do we make new ones?
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
For day 21 of advent of papers we are covering a topic completely ignored by software engineering, but crucial to it, Conceptual Engineering. How do we fix our broken concepts? How do we make new ones?
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Amnon H Eden argues that computer science is really three different paradigms. Rationalistic, Technocratic, and Scientific.
This paper argues that we should abandon the first two and "be scientific". Are they right?
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Amnon H Eden argues that computer science is really three different paradigms. Rationalistic, Technocratic, and Scientific.
This paper argues that we should abandon the first two and "be scientific". Are they right?
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Looking for papers I’m unfamiliar with as I’m finishing up my adventure of papers.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Looking for papers I’m unfamiliar with as I’m finishing up my adventure of papers.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Now it's time to get funky
To the right now
To the left
Take it back now y'all
Twelve hops this time
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Now it's time to get funky
To the right now
To the left
Take it back now y'all
Twelve hops this time
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
Slide to the left
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Day 18 of advent of papers.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Day 18 of advent of papers.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Are the things we learn from culture like programs? Are this programs at all like computer programs? Does this paper have substance? Am I just missing something? From the massive number of citations the paper has, I'm guessing so.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Are the things we learn from culture like programs? Are this programs at all like computer programs? Does this paper have substance? Am I just missing something? From the massive number of citations the paper has, I'm guessing so.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Will Computers Ever Become Easy to Use? by Jef Raskin. Raskin believes that apps stand in the way of computers being easy. But in the nearly 20 years since, alternatives haven't really been explored. Will they ever be?
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Will Computers Ever Become Easy to Use? by Jef Raskin. Raskin believes that apps stand in the way of computers being easy. But in the nearly 20 years since, alternatives haven't really been explored. Will they ever be?
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
This tutorial on bidirectional type checking really makes the whole seem way less magical. I was amazed at how easy writing a basic type checker with this setup was.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
This tutorial on bidirectional type checking really makes the whole seem way less magical. I was amazed at how easy writing a basic type checker with this setup was.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
What is knowledge? In this 3 page paper, Edmund Gettier over-turned a tradition reaching back to Plato which told us that it was "Justified True Belief". Turns out, that was wrong.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
What is knowledge? In this 3 page paper, Edmund Gettier over-turned a tradition reaching back to Plato which told us that it was "Justified True Belief". Turns out, that was wrong.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Advent of papers day 12:
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Advent of papers day 12:
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
But day 11 of advent of papers provides a super interesting take on a version of OO that is completely compatible with immutability and purity. On Understanding Data Abstraction, Revisited by William Cook.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
But day 11 of advent of papers provides a super interesting take on a version of OO that is completely compatible with immutability and purity. On Understanding Data Abstraction, Revisited by William Cook.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Do LLMs actually model language? Not if we properly consider language in its full human context. In day 10 of advent of papers, we look at ways in which LLMs fall short.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Do LLMs actually model language? Not if we properly consider language in its full human context. In day 10 of advent of papers, we look at ways in which LLMs fall short.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Day 9 of advent of papers, I may have cheated because this isn't a computing paper. But it has completely changed the way I write my code.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Day 9 of advent of papers, I may have cheated because this isn't a computing paper. But it has completely changed the way I write my code.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Hopefully I can read and share some of weirder computer related papers.
First paper is Elephant 2000 by John McCarthy. Did you know he didn't just make lisp? Wonderful paper, worth a read.
For advent of papers day 8 we look at a 1992 paper that gives us a better alternative.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
For advent of papers day 8 we look at a 1992 paper that gives us a better alternative.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Well according to Rapaport the answer is "Semantic interpretation". But what does that mean? Well, it kind of sounds like the stuff haskellers say when they tell you about monads.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...
Well according to Rapaport the answer is "Semantic interpretation". But what does that mean? Well, it kind of sounds like the stuff haskellers say when they tell you about monads.
jimmyhmiller.github.io/advent-of-pa...