Jiahui Liu
@jiahuiliu.bsky.social
Researcher in quantum computing, cryptography and TCS. She/her.
The question is whether there is a mechanism to stop this vicious cycle....The entire academia is under some crazy capitalist incentive mode nowadays that pushes people to publish for the sake of publish. sigh.
December 9, 2024 at 5:52 PM
The question is whether there is a mechanism to stop this vicious cycle....The entire academia is under some crazy capitalist incentive mode nowadays that pushes people to publish for the sake of publish. sigh.
I definitely agree. I'm against mass producing papers. But I also think there's a vicious cycle here. Some people find review procedures to be unreliable, but if they write enough papers, then some will get in by this randomness. So they mass produce papers, which results in poorer review quality.
December 9, 2024 at 5:42 PM
I definitely agree. I'm against mass producing papers. But I also think there's a vicious cycle here. Some people find review procedures to be unreliable, but if they write enough papers, then some will get in by this randomness. So they mass produce papers, which results in poorer review quality.
Our result is "win-win" in the following sense: we either have a classical oracle separation of QMA and QCMA, or we will have a quantum advantage in distinguishing pseudorandom distributions on permutations, which is closely related to the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture.
November 28, 2024 at 4:50 AM
Our result is "win-win" in the following sense: we either have a classical oracle separation of QMA and QCMA, or we will have a quantum advantage in distinguishing pseudorandom distributions on permutations, which is closely related to the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture.