1.) Grab attention
2.) Appeal to an audience that doesn’t listen to MeidasTouch or Rachel Maddow.
I think it’s the same general idea of people who thought Kamala should go on Rogan. Not saying I agree, but I think that’s the theory.
1.) Grab attention
2.) Appeal to an audience that doesn’t listen to MeidasTouch or Rachel Maddow.
I think it’s the same general idea of people who thought Kamala should go on Rogan. Not saying I agree, but I think that’s the theory.
“Man our economy is in the 💩er, wouldn’t it be nice, my fellow millionaires and billionaires, to have a completely new frontier ripe for investment?”
“Man our economy is in the 💩er, wouldn’t it be nice, my fellow millionaires and billionaires, to have a completely new frontier ripe for investment?”
You’ve got a new fan 😁❤️
You’ve got a new fan 😁❤️
In fairness, there WERE high profile people that walked out of the address, and people who didn’t attend in the first place.
Maybe the thought is the GOP has their bombs throwers and we’ve got our fighters, and they’ve got a long leash but the whole caucus won’t be as outspoken?
In fairness, there WERE high profile people that walked out of the address, and people who didn’t attend in the first place.
Maybe the thought is the GOP has their bombs throwers and we’ve got our fighters, and they’ve got a long leash but the whole caucus won’t be as outspoken?
They’re trying to say the courts checking Trumps power is a judicial coup, not that they themselves are doing a coup.
(To be clear, they’re wrong- but they aren’t admitting to doing a coup here)
They’re trying to say the courts checking Trumps power is a judicial coup, not that they themselves are doing a coup.
(To be clear, they’re wrong- but they aren’t admitting to doing a coup here)
This is why I think Elon and Vivek fail. I think they'll focus on business efficiency and will completely miss on effectiveness (which is ultimately what the people want).
This is why I think Elon and Vivek fail. I think they'll focus on business efficiency and will completely miss on effectiveness (which is ultimately what the people want).
I think the frustration with gov't isn't that it takes too many resources, but that it is ineffective.
I believe that gov't is, ultimately, a tool to help people. A cold, calculated view of dollars and cents can't be the driving force.
I think the frustration with gov't isn't that it takes too many resources, but that it is ineffective.
I believe that gov't is, ultimately, a tool to help people. A cold, calculated view of dollars and cents can't be the driving force.