If you reside in a foreign state that makes you a citizen of the state?

or that the BBC might be protected by the US First amendment given the speeches were made in an official capacity? (US constitutional experts feel free to correct)

Hobson’s Pledge didn’t read the contractual terms. Perhaps their allies who value property rights should have a word?

Isn’t the US on the globe? Last time I looked at a global map, it wasn’t in the moon?

Old habits are hard to break. The article is very interesting. Reminiscent of the nature/nurture debates. Unlikely to be either/or but of degree. Also depends on what you define as science - the big ideas and theories or the day to day stuff.

By this logic (it’s an increase), the pay equity changes are definitely a cut?

The first paper looks very interesting. (Note a stray “s” when the site refers to cases explored?)

Always a go to section, every Sunday! Thank you.

Me ought to have done that first?

But he can take credit for not scrapping the annual adjustment?

That assumes there was a time when there was American exceptionalism rather than a myth of it?

Asked the same question for all the legal person companies?

Did he apply that approach to himself?

Thanks. Will have a play but it seems odd to include share equity as a business liability. If the data tells you who holds it that helps (ie how much of dividends are not NZ owned.) Also a circular problem for Government mixed ownership company shareholding?

It doesn’t make sense to treat shares as a liability? (However, it does make sense if your comment re the yellow line). If that is the common measure, then an excluding shares measure would make sense as a comparator. Are KiwiSaver funds included in businesses?

Deadweight cost!?

BEPS 1.0 may have had an effect? (Eg anti-hybrid legislation as already shifted income to low tax from no tax jurisdictions)?