Jez Bayes
@jezbayes.bsky.social
Ref's overreacted more than the players
November 24, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Ref's overreacted more than the players
I thought in this campaign they get outplayed for 85 minutes and then inexplicably come back to win?
November 15, 2025 at 9:08 PM
I thought in this campaign they get outplayed for 85 minutes and then inexplicably come back to win?
This guy's on the bench.
Can't do any worse, surely?
Can't do any worse, surely?
November 15, 2025 at 9:06 PM
This guy's on the bench.
Can't do any worse, surely?
Can't do any worse, surely?
I thought California had a legal block on this?
October 15, 2025 at 7:57 PM
I thought California had a legal block on this?
Confused question:
If Nuno was sacked because he fell out with the blind-trusted non-involved owner, doesn't that undermine Forest's case to replace multi-club Palace in the Europa?
I genuinely don't understand the lack of media or Palace fan focus on this.
If Nuno was sacked because he fell out with the blind-trusted non-involved owner, doesn't that undermine Forest's case to replace multi-club Palace in the Europa?
I genuinely don't understand the lack of media or Palace fan focus on this.
September 9, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Confused question:
If Nuno was sacked because he fell out with the blind-trusted non-involved owner, doesn't that undermine Forest's case to replace multi-club Palace in the Europa?
I genuinely don't understand the lack of media or Palace fan focus on this.
If Nuno was sacked because he fell out with the blind-trusted non-involved owner, doesn't that undermine Forest's case to replace multi-club Palace in the Europa?
I genuinely don't understand the lack of media or Palace fan focus on this.
Long throw ins and free kicks = not football?
Expect a season of teams roughing up that suspect defence then.
Expect a season of teams roughing up that suspect defence then.
August 25, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Long throw ins and free kicks = not football?
Expect a season of teams roughing up that suspect defence then.
Expect a season of teams roughing up that suspect defence then.
Liverpool need better defenders more than another attacker.
August 25, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Liverpool need better defenders more than another attacker.
Play by the rules?
Here it is then, by which Gill needed to believe they had a prospect of winning.
He didn't.
I actually agree with Sidharth, but technically by the rules Stokes was correct, not this journalist, so the rule must need rewording.
Here it is then, by which Gill needed to believe they had a prospect of winning.
He didn't.
I actually agree with Sidharth, but technically by the rules Stokes was correct, not this journalist, so the rule must need rewording.
July 28, 2025 at 5:27 AM
Play by the rules?
Here it is then, by which Gill needed to believe they had a prospect of winning.
He didn't.
I actually agree with Sidharth, but technically by the rules Stokes was correct, not this journalist, so the rule must need rewording.
Here it is then, by which Gill needed to believe they had a prospect of winning.
He didn't.
I actually agree with Sidharth, but technically by the rules Stokes was correct, not this journalist, so the rule must need rewording.
>>
Now we trust the technology 100% (🤔) why don't we just allow lbw if it's hitting the stumps, wherever it pitches or impacts?
Now we trust the technology 100% (🤔) why don't we just allow lbw if it's hitting the stumps, wherever it pitches or impacts?
July 14, 2025 at 6:33 AM
>>
Now we trust the technology 100% (🤔) why don't we just allow lbw if it's hitting the stumps, wherever it pitches or impacts?
Now we trust the technology 100% (🤔) why don't we just allow lbw if it's hitting the stumps, wherever it pitches or impacts?
England 'frontrunners'?
A bit odd when they were behind until Smith's final 6 sailed into the stand.
India were frontrunners & didn't hit home their advantage.
England chased them down.
Again.
Catching, fielding, tailend batting, and bowling were all at fault, and only top order batsmen were great.
A bit odd when they were behind until Smith's final 6 sailed into the stand.
India were frontrunners & didn't hit home their advantage.
England chased them down.
Again.
Catching, fielding, tailend batting, and bowling were all at fault, and only top order batsmen were great.
June 25, 2025 at 7:30 PM
England 'frontrunners'?
A bit odd when they were behind until Smith's final 6 sailed into the stand.
India were frontrunners & didn't hit home their advantage.
England chased them down.
Again.
Catching, fielding, tailend batting, and bowling were all at fault, and only top order batsmen were great.
A bit odd when they were behind until Smith's final 6 sailed into the stand.
India were frontrunners & didn't hit home their advantage.
England chased them down.
Again.
Catching, fielding, tailend batting, and bowling were all at fault, and only top order batsmen were great.
Ok, maybe, but that begs the question about sending a loan officer to a shooting threat.
June 16, 2025 at 11:42 PM
Ok, maybe, but that begs the question about sending a loan officer to a shooting threat.
4/5 seems quite mean!
June 16, 2025 at 10:06 PM
4/5 seems quite mean!
She called him thinking he was Police, and when he failed to answer she drove away to look at the house. Surely you'd challenge and ask for identifiers? Especially when there's suspicion of a threat.
June 16, 2025 at 10:06 PM
She called him thinking he was Police, and when he failed to answer she drove away to look at the house. Surely you'd challenge and ask for identifiers? Especially when there's suspicion of a threat.
Killer on the loose by Thin Lizzy is inexcusable throughout
June 16, 2025 at 5:00 PM
Killer on the loose by Thin Lizzy is inexcusable throughout
I guess correct id protocols will be reintroduced now after the horse has bolted. Driving away when he failed to answer seems very substandard.
June 16, 2025 at 4:54 PM
I guess correct id protocols will be reintroduced now after the horse has bolted. Driving away when he failed to answer seems very substandard.
Always a great pod btw.
Thanks.
Tried to find SEN comms in the UK today but failed!
Thanks.
Tried to find SEN comms in the UK today but failed!
June 12, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Always a great pod btw.
Thanks.
Tried to find SEN comms in the UK today but failed!
Thanks.
Tried to find SEN comms in the UK today but failed!
True.
But I thought they were pivotal.
If Australia win by 1 to 50 rums- probably my prediction atm - then the lbw they missed might have been the moment Aus got enough of a base to win from.
Haven't heard today's TFW yet, but weird the way SA couldn't get their slips at the right distance today???
But I thought they were pivotal.
If Australia win by 1 to 50 rums- probably my prediction atm - then the lbw they missed might have been the moment Aus got enough of a base to win from.
Haven't heard today's TFW yet, but weird the way SA couldn't get their slips at the right distance today???
June 12, 2025 at 11:06 PM
True.
But I thought they were pivotal.
If Australia win by 1 to 50 rums- probably my prediction atm - then the lbw they missed might have been the moment Aus got enough of a base to win from.
Haven't heard today's TFW yet, but weird the way SA couldn't get their slips at the right distance today???
But I thought they were pivotal.
If Australia win by 1 to 50 rums- probably my prediction atm - then the lbw they missed might have been the moment Aus got enough of a base to win from.
Haven't heard today's TFW yet, but weird the way SA couldn't get their slips at the right distance today???
Final Word Daily.
Did I miss the mention of bungled reviews by SA? In a low scoring match they might be decisive.
The one they didn't take where Webster would have been lbw on 8, and the one they did where he middled it, could hv gone in the Hall of Fame.
Sadly it looks like you took after Bavuma!!!
Did I miss the mention of bungled reviews by SA? In a low scoring match they might be decisive.
The one they didn't take where Webster would have been lbw on 8, and the one they did where he middled it, could hv gone in the Hall of Fame.
Sadly it looks like you took after Bavuma!!!
June 12, 2025 at 7:30 AM
Final Word Daily.
Did I miss the mention of bungled reviews by SA? In a low scoring match they might be decisive.
The one they didn't take where Webster would have been lbw on 8, and the one they did where he middled it, could hv gone in the Hall of Fame.
Sadly it looks like you took after Bavuma!!!
Did I miss the mention of bungled reviews by SA? In a low scoring match they might be decisive.
The one they didn't take where Webster would have been lbw on 8, and the one they did where he middled it, could hv gone in the Hall of Fame.
Sadly it looks like you took after Bavuma!!!
Final Word Daily.
No mention of bungled reviews by SA? In a low scoring match they might be decisive.
I thought the one they didn't take where Webster would have been lbw on 8, and the one they did where he middled it, were going in the Hall of Fame.
Sadly it looks like you took after Bavuma!!!
No mention of bungled reviews by SA? In a low scoring match they might be decisive.
I thought the one they didn't take where Webster would have been lbw on 8, and the one they did where he middled it, were going in the Hall of Fame.
Sadly it looks like you took after Bavuma!!!
June 12, 2025 at 7:28 AM
Final Word Daily.
No mention of bungled reviews by SA? In a low scoring match they might be decisive.
I thought the one they didn't take where Webster would have been lbw on 8, and the one they did where he middled it, were going in the Hall of Fame.
Sadly it looks like you took after Bavuma!!!
No mention of bungled reviews by SA? In a low scoring match they might be decisive.
I thought the one they didn't take where Webster would have been lbw on 8, and the one they did where he middled it, were going in the Hall of Fame.
Sadly it looks like you took after Bavuma!!!
America is reversing back to the middle ages.
June 12, 2025 at 7:25 AM
America is reversing back to the middle ages.