Jess O'Hagan
@jessohagan.bsky.social
American in Ireland
Chronically online, books, science, baseball, games, some global politics? Who knows. It's like the middle aisle of Aldi in here
Chronically online, books, science, baseball, games, some global politics? Who knows. It's like the middle aisle of Aldi in here
Reposted by Jess O'Hagan
We will put forward a 500 million package for 2025-2027 to make Europe a magnet for researchers.
As well as ambitious proposals for R&I in the next EU budget.
We will also offer the best and brightest the right incentives to come to Europe ↓
As well as ambitious proposals for R&I in the next EU budget.
We will also offer the best and brightest the right incentives to come to Europe ↓
May 5, 2025 at 10:02 AM
We will put forward a 500 million package for 2025-2027 to make Europe a magnet for researchers.
As well as ambitious proposals for R&I in the next EU budget.
We will also offer the best and brightest the right incentives to come to Europe ↓
As well as ambitious proposals for R&I in the next EU budget.
We will also offer the best and brightest the right incentives to come to Europe ↓
Reposted by Jess O'Hagan
Whew, this conclusion from the Fourth Circuit:
"We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos."
"We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos."
April 17, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Whew, this conclusion from the Fourth Circuit:
"We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos."
"We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos."
Hey Sam, just wanted to thank you for honestly engaging with the community. I thought you were polite and non-argumentative, and it's good to see people able to have constructive discussions online. I can see you absolutely had the best intentions with this
April 11, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Hey Sam, just wanted to thank you for honestly engaging with the community. I thought you were polite and non-argumentative, and it's good to see people able to have constructive discussions online. I can see you absolutely had the best intentions with this
Sure, there's a few main reasons. 1. GenAI is normally trained unethically using copyrighted material.
2. It's taking jobs away from journalists. Why not pay creatives for their work?
3. Hallucinations and errors are real. Who is double checking the work, and why can't they write the summaries?
2. It's taking jobs away from journalists. Why not pay creatives for their work?
3. Hallucinations and errors are real. Who is double checking the work, and why can't they write the summaries?
April 11, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Sure, there's a few main reasons. 1. GenAI is normally trained unethically using copyrighted material.
2. It's taking jobs away from journalists. Why not pay creatives for their work?
3. Hallucinations and errors are real. Who is double checking the work, and why can't they write the summaries?
2. It's taking jobs away from journalists. Why not pay creatives for their work?
3. Hallucinations and errors are real. Who is double checking the work, and why can't they write the summaries?
Please don't. We don't need more AI in situations like this
April 11, 2025 at 8:52 AM
Please don't. We don't need more AI in situations like this
Her husband is Chris Miller?
February 9, 2025 at 1:29 AM
Her husband is Chris Miller?
No one else was on the ballot. No repub challengers, independents, or dems at all. Disgraceful.
February 9, 2025 at 1:28 AM
No one else was on the ballot. No repub challengers, independents, or dems at all. Disgraceful.