Reposted by Jessica
Stripping this out doesn’t purify your economics; it blinds you to how the economy actually functions.
What’s more, the right will attack any left economic program as radical/woke/socialist regardless of how carefully you distance yourself. This should be trivially obvious.
7/
What’s more, the right will attack any left economic program as radical/woke/socialist regardless of how carefully you distance yourself. This should be trivially obvious.
7/
November 24, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Stripping this out doesn’t purify your economics; it blinds you to how the economy actually functions.
What’s more, the right will attack any left economic program as radical/woke/socialist regardless of how carefully you distance yourself. This should be trivially obvious.
7/
What’s more, the right will attack any left economic program as radical/woke/socialist regardless of how carefully you distance yourself. This should be trivially obvious.
7/
Reposted by Jessica
Mass incarceration is an economic issue. Housing discrimination is an economic issue. Healthcare disparities are economic.
The precarity, deindustrialization, and anemic economic access that are driving populist rage hit marginalized communities first—they were the canary in the coal mine.
6/
The precarity, deindustrialization, and anemic economic access that are driving populist rage hit marginalized communities first—they were the canary in the coal mine.
6/
November 24, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Mass incarceration is an economic issue. Housing discrimination is an economic issue. Healthcare disparities are economic.
The precarity, deindustrialization, and anemic economic access that are driving populist rage hit marginalized communities first—they were the canary in the coal mine.
6/
The precarity, deindustrialization, and anemic economic access that are driving populist rage hit marginalized communities first—they were the canary in the coal mine.
6/
Reposted by Jessica
Any viable left-populist economic coalition in a diverse polity has to include people whose economic exploitation is experienced through racialized and gendered forms.
You can’t ask them to bracket out those concerns as a precondition for solidarity that… just doesn’t make any goddamn sense.
2/
You can’t ask them to bracket out those concerns as a precondition for solidarity that… just doesn’t make any goddamn sense.
2/
November 24, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Any viable left-populist economic coalition in a diverse polity has to include people whose economic exploitation is experienced through racialized and gendered forms.
You can’t ask them to bracket out those concerns as a precondition for solidarity that… just doesn’t make any goddamn sense.
2/
You can’t ask them to bracket out those concerns as a precondition for solidarity that… just doesn’t make any goddamn sense.
2/
“we went looking where we expected to find something and lo and behold, we found it” is usually a good thing as far as theoretical validation goes, though
November 15, 2025 at 12:46 PM
“we went looking where we expected to find something and lo and behold, we found it” is usually a good thing as far as theoretical validation goes, though
It’s *the* most read article today!
November 14, 2025 at 2:48 PM
It’s *the* most read article today!