Jerreu
@jerreu.bsky.social
Ad postremum proelium
eamus iuncti et cras
Laboratorum hymnus
sociabit homines
he/him
eamus iuncti et cras
Laboratorum hymnus
sociabit homines
he/him
Hier findest du jemanden, der das jedenfalls mit ner Autobahn macht...
November 21, 2023 at 8:41 PM
Hier findest du jemanden, der das jedenfalls mit ner Autobahn macht...
Differently: Not once has a responsible politician set their own ambition over the necessities of the state, which in turn makes them so responsible. This ofc holds true for both Trump and Biden who have opposing programs for what the nation needs.
November 16, 2023 at 1:23 AM
Differently: Not once has a responsible politician set their own ambition over the necessities of the state, which in turn makes them so responsible. This ofc holds true for both Trump and Biden who have opposing programs for what the nation needs.
because the state sets and enables one's own condition for competition and survival.
November 16, 2023 at 1:17 AM
because the state sets and enables one's own condition for competition and survival.
one confirms by voting for the 'lesser evil'.
Of course the error here lies in misunderstanding the 'nations necessities' as objective necessities and not what the nation 'owes itself' and in believing that the forthcoming of the nation is the same as your own forthcoming,
Of course the error here lies in misunderstanding the 'nations necessities' as objective necessities and not what the nation 'owes itself' and in believing that the forthcoming of the nation is the same as your own forthcoming,
November 16, 2023 at 1:17 AM
one confirms by voting for the 'lesser evil'.
Of course the error here lies in misunderstanding the 'nations necessities' as objective necessities and not what the nation 'owes itself' and in believing that the forthcoming of the nation is the same as your own forthcoming,
Of course the error here lies in misunderstanding the 'nations necessities' as objective necessities and not what the nation 'owes itself' and in believing that the forthcoming of the nation is the same as your own forthcoming,
This argument is shared between all democratic debates everywhere and it is always nothing, but the admission that one is indeed totally subsumed under the interests of the state, whose necessity for the nation and thereby for oneself, who is the dependant variable of the nation,
November 16, 2023 at 1:17 AM
This argument is shared between all democratic debates everywhere and it is always nothing, but the admission that one is indeed totally subsumed under the interests of the state, whose necessity for the nation and thereby for oneself, who is the dependant variable of the nation,
But then apparently you see yourself not as the authoritative subject but solely the object and resource of your government, since to you the only question is that of the vote. Which is indeed true of course, but then again it is contradictory to, in such a position, afirm the state's power in votin
November 16, 2023 at 1:06 AM
But then apparently you see yourself not as the authoritative subject but solely the object and resource of your government, since to you the only question is that of the vote. Which is indeed true of course, but then again it is contradictory to, in such a position, afirm the state's power in votin
Only caring for a negative is absurd.
Obviously you both find that a Trump presidency would be bad for the nation and that things that are bad for the nation are bad. And lastly you apparently hold that you need someone to govern over you, placing your absolute trust in the Democrats
Obviously you both find that a Trump presidency would be bad for the nation and that things that are bad for the nation are bad. And lastly you apparently hold that you need someone to govern over you, placing your absolute trust in the Democrats
November 16, 2023 at 1:00 AM
Only caring for a negative is absurd.
Obviously you both find that a Trump presidency would be bad for the nation and that things that are bad for the nation are bad. And lastly you apparently hold that you need someone to govern over you, placing your absolute trust in the Democrats
Obviously you both find that a Trump presidency would be bad for the nation and that things that are bad for the nation are bad. And lastly you apparently hold that you need someone to govern over you, placing your absolute trust in the Democrats
If you have such an anti-critical/anti-intellectual attitude towards the topic then why do you even care at all?
November 15, 2023 at 6:19 PM
If you have such an anti-critical/anti-intellectual attitude towards the topic then why do you even care at all?
Directly in opposition to your argument:
The Democratic Vote -
School of Nationalism
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/voting.htm
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The Vote – A Blank Check for State Power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
The Democratic Vote -
School of Nationalism
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/voting.htm
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The Vote – A Blank Check for State Power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
The Democratic Vote - School of Nationalism
www.ruthlesscriticism.com
November 15, 2023 at 8:44 AM
Directly in opposition to your argument:
The Democratic Vote -
School of Nationalism
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/voting.htm
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The Vote – A Blank Check for State Power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
The Democratic Vote -
School of Nationalism
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/voting.htm
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The Vote – A Blank Check for State Power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
I implore you: Look at the nature of the vote, at the nature of the state.
Maybe, if you are interested, these polemic articles are helpful for forming a proper notion of the vote:
Maybe, if you are interested, these polemic articles are helpful for forming a proper notion of the vote:
November 15, 2023 at 8:43 AM
I implore you: Look at the nature of the vote, at the nature of the state.
Maybe, if you are interested, these polemic articles are helpful for forming a proper notion of the vote:
Maybe, if you are interested, these polemic articles are helpful for forming a proper notion of the vote:
if you constantly ask the question: How can I best get by? The question is a mistake that makes any objective look on the matter at hand impossible. And thus you can only come to such a horrible conclusion: If you critique the vote you must actually want the opposition to win.
November 15, 2023 at 8:35 AM
if you constantly ask the question: How can I best get by? The question is a mistake that makes any objective look on the matter at hand impossible. And thus you can only come to such a horrible conclusion: If you critique the vote you must actually want the opposition to win.
When searching for alternatives, searching for the best way to get through in this life, you will never, because you can never, get to a proper notion of the ongoings in this world. You will never ask: Why is that, what is that? about such shitty things like the wages, or the vote, or war
November 15, 2023 at 8:35 AM
When searching for alternatives, searching for the best way to get through in this life, you will never, because you can never, get to a proper notion of the ongoings in this world. You will never ask: Why is that, what is that? about such shitty things like the wages, or the vote, or war
These are all insights into the objective nature of the state.
And what I meant is that if you have a proper notion of the state you will have a critique of it.
And what I meant is that if you have a proper notion of the state you will have a critique of it.
November 15, 2023 at 12:33 AM
These are all insights into the objective nature of the state.
And what I meant is that if you have a proper notion of the state you will have a critique of it.
And what I meant is that if you have a proper notion of the state you will have a critique of it.
success in life depends on the success of the nation. This is made excruciatingly obvious in war, when the opposition between state and people becomes absolute *and* the peoples' very life depends on the interests and the sovereignty of the state as they become one.
November 15, 2023 at 12:33 AM
success in life depends on the success of the nation. This is made excruciatingly obvious in war, when the opposition between state and people becomes absolute *and* the peoples' very life depends on the interests and the sovereignty of the state as they become one.
It is the violence of the state, its definitory power that ensures, enshrines, oversees and cares for a system of competition, in which a vast majority are wholly expropriated and have but their capacity for work as a source of income and in which then the peoples'
November 15, 2023 at 12:33 AM
It is the violence of the state, its definitory power that ensures, enshrines, oversees and cares for a system of competition, in which a vast majority are wholly expropriated and have but their capacity for work as a source of income and in which then the peoples'
I am not saying maybe critique rulership, what i meant to say was: Look at what a state objectively *is*. A monopoly on violence that by subjecting them defines a people who are then in turn (taxes, dying soldiers in war,...) the basis of the states power.
November 15, 2023 at 12:32 AM
I am not saying maybe critique rulership, what i meant to say was: Look at what a state objectively *is*. A monopoly on violence that by subjecting them defines a people who are then in turn (taxes, dying soldiers in war,...) the basis of the states power.
The conflict between Biden and Trump is not one of democracy and oligarchy or whatever, but a democratic fight over the correct utilization of american power for US interests and the morals of the nation and the alignment of the american state as a whole.
November 15, 2023 at 12:19 AM
The conflict between Biden and Trump is not one of democracy and oligarchy or whatever, but a democratic fight over the correct utilization of american power for US interests and the morals of the nation and the alignment of the american state as a whole.
They don't want to institute some different horrific oligarchic (world) order. They already have their democratic world peace order. And if you actually meant that billionaires would then overtake all government power you simply misunderstand the relationship between capital and state.
November 15, 2023 at 12:19 AM
They don't want to institute some different horrific oligarchic (world) order. They already have their democratic world peace order. And if you actually meant that billionaires would then overtake all government power you simply misunderstand the relationship between capital and state.
By this you mean that, if one does not vote, the powers that be will abandon this grandiose democracy and institute an oligarchy. I don't know where you get that idea from, considering that all I ever see is advocacy for more democracy in the world.
November 15, 2023 at 12:19 AM
By this you mean that, if one does not vote, the powers that be will abandon this grandiose democracy and institute an oligarchy. I don't know where you get that idea from, considering that all I ever see is advocacy for more democracy in the world.
I am critiquing you, unless you did not mean the above comment seriously
November 15, 2023 at 12:02 AM
I am critiquing you, unless you did not mean the above comment seriously
This absolute opposition of people and state can be seen in war: The interests and existence of the state are fought out with the life of its citizens
What's so odd about that is that in war, by the own state and by the enemy, ones own survival is totally set in one with the enforcement of the state
What's so odd about that is that in war, by the own state and by the enemy, ones own survival is totally set in one with the enforcement of the state
November 14, 2023 at 9:31 PM
This absolute opposition of people and state can be seen in war: The interests and existence of the state are fought out with the life of its citizens
What's so odd about that is that in war, by the own state and by the enemy, ones own survival is totally set in one with the enforcement of the state
What's so odd about that is that in war, by the own state and by the enemy, ones own survival is totally set in one with the enforcement of the state
It is wholly incredible how a critique of the vote and democracy can so reliably be understood as an endorsement of voting for the opposition. And conversely it's quite odd that a lot of people who criticize Biden in such a fashion are actually endorsing the state in the subjunctive mood.
November 14, 2023 at 6:12 PM
It is wholly incredible how a critique of the vote and democracy can so reliably be understood as an endorsement of voting for the opposition. And conversely it's quite odd that a lot of people who criticize Biden in such a fashion are actually endorsing the state in the subjunctive mood.
Some critiques concerning the vote:
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The vote – A blank check for state power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The vote – A blank check for state power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com
November 14, 2023 at 6:01 PM
Some critiques concerning the vote:
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The vote – A blank check for state power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
The vote – the free citizen’s moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The vote – A blank check for state power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
And maybe then the thought that there is no perfect leader becomes a critique of rulership, as opposed to an endorsement of someone who has a program for the state and an image of its necessities, which is indeed different from Trump's program for the US state...
November 14, 2023 at 5:52 PM
And maybe then the thought that there is no perfect leader becomes a critique of rulership, as opposed to an endorsement of someone who has a program for the state and an image of its necessities, which is indeed different from Trump's program for the US state...