JDubbAHA🌳🪓
@jdubbaha.bsky.social
Abolitionist - Abolish Abortion to the Glory of God!
Christian - Calvinist
Opinions expressed are my own.
Retweets are not endorsements.
Find me on X @JDubbAHA
Christian - Calvinist
Opinions expressed are my own.
Retweets are not endorsements.
Find me on X @JDubbAHA
I forget how many factually incorrect things you've spewed, but again, you're wrong.
Pro-life and Abolitionists are not the same. If you're this interested in the counterargument, you could at least try and be right.
Pro-life and Abolitionists are not the same. If you're this interested in the counterargument, you could at least try and be right.
January 8, 2025 at 12:12 AM
I forget how many factually incorrect things you've spewed, but again, you're wrong.
Pro-life and Abolitionists are not the same. If you're this interested in the counterargument, you could at least try and be right.
Pro-life and Abolitionists are not the same. If you're this interested in the counterargument, you could at least try and be right.
It's funny how you say I'm emotional. I haven't attacked either of you.
I do find it interesting that you're not able to answer to your own claim though.
That shows incredible cowardice and an unwillingness to learn. I bet you use ChatGPT to argue. Did it tell you to say the Freudian slip line?
I do find it interesting that you're not able to answer to your own claim though.
That shows incredible cowardice and an unwillingness to learn. I bet you use ChatGPT to argue. Did it tell you to say the Freudian slip line?
January 8, 2025 at 12:01 AM
It's funny how you say I'm emotional. I haven't attacked either of you.
I do find it interesting that you're not able to answer to your own claim though.
That shows incredible cowardice and an unwillingness to learn. I bet you use ChatGPT to argue. Did it tell you to say the Freudian slip line?
I do find it interesting that you're not able to answer to your own claim though.
That shows incredible cowardice and an unwillingness to learn. I bet you use ChatGPT to argue. Did it tell you to say the Freudian slip line?
Did you graduate High School yet?
How are you this bad at responding to your own claims?
How are you this bad at responding to your own claims?
January 7, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Did you graduate High School yet?
How are you this bad at responding to your own claims?
How are you this bad at responding to your own claims?
When did I ever say that it was performed? I didn't, you assumed, I said it should be an explored option.
If you'd like to take the L that you assume is a W, go ahead, but winning an argument by putting your words in your opponents mouth is pretty cringe. NGL
If you'd like to take the L that you assume is a W, go ahead, but winning an argument by putting your words in your opponents mouth is pretty cringe. NGL
January 7, 2025 at 11:55 PM
When did I ever say that it was performed? I didn't, you assumed, I said it should be an explored option.
If you'd like to take the L that you assume is a W, go ahead, but winning an argument by putting your words in your opponents mouth is pretty cringe. NGL
If you'd like to take the L that you assume is a W, go ahead, but winning an argument by putting your words in your opponents mouth is pretty cringe. NGL
Can you define that? If so, go ahead and show me my error.
January 7, 2025 at 11:52 PM
Can you define that? If so, go ahead and show me my error.
Maybe you should reread my reply. I think you got lost somewhere and arrived back at your pointless question to make yourself feel better about being a murderous sinner.
January 7, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Maybe you should reread my reply. I think you got lost somewhere and arrived back at your pointless question to make yourself feel better about being a murderous sinner.
You highlighted the fact that I said Men and not WOmen. You clearly responded in a way that again removes any possibility of a discussion. Words don't hurt.
January 7, 2025 at 11:47 PM
You highlighted the fact that I said Men and not WOmen. You clearly responded in a way that again removes any possibility of a discussion. Words don't hurt.
What you're really arguing is that if saving a life is difficult, we should default to murder. That's not medical care, it's moral cowardice. Instead of defending death, how about demanding progress? Innovation follows conviction, not compromise.
January 7, 2025 at 11:45 PM
What you're really arguing is that if saving a life is difficult, we should default to murder. That's not medical care, it's moral cowardice. Instead of defending death, how about demanding progress? Innovation follows conviction, not compromise.
it highlights the failure of our culture to prioritize life-saving advancements.
Historically, life-saving treatments often began as experiments, yet pioneers pushed forward because human lives mattered.
Historically, life-saving treatments often began as experiments, yet pioneers pushed forward because human lives mattered.
January 7, 2025 at 11:45 PM
it highlights the failure of our culture to prioritize life-saving advancements.
Historically, life-saving treatments often began as experiments, yet pioneers pushed forward because human lives mattered.
Historically, life-saving treatments often began as experiments, yet pioneers pushed forward because human lives mattered.
You're demanding proof of perfected procedures while defending the intentional killing of innocent children as a default "solution." That's the real deflection.
The lack of successful cases in the U.S. doesn't make the procedure impossible,
The lack of successful cases in the U.S. doesn't make the procedure impossible,
January 7, 2025 at 11:45 PM
You're demanding proof of perfected procedures while defending the intentional killing of innocent children as a default "solution." That's the real deflection.
The lack of successful cases in the U.S. doesn't make the procedure impossible,
The lack of successful cases in the U.S. doesn't make the procedure impossible,
I'm right for other reasons, not for your DEI, attention seeking, notice me because I'm different than you nonesense.
January 7, 2025 at 11:42 PM
I'm right for other reasons, not for your DEI, attention seeking, notice me because I'm different than you nonesense.
You mean this?
What is false about my explanation of this?
What is false about my explanation of this?
January 7, 2025 at 11:41 PM
You mean this?
What is false about my explanation of this?
What is false about my explanation of this?
For this to be true no matter the time period, there would have to be 75 MILLION rapes in that time period because only .4% of Abortions are reported as rape being the reason.
Here's the facts on what I'm saying.
lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-r...
Here's the facts on what I'm saying.
lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-r...
Fact Sheet: Reasons for Abortion - Lozier Institute
Originally published on August 17, 2022, this fact sheet was updated on January 14, 2023, and again on May 24, 2024. After the Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, sta...
lozierinstitute.org
January 7, 2025 at 11:39 PM
For this to be true no matter the time period, there would have to be 75 MILLION rapes in that time period because only .4% of Abortions are reported as rape being the reason.
Here's the facts on what I'm saying.
lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-r...
Here's the facts on what I'm saying.
lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-r...
You got facts to support that and what's the time period?
January 7, 2025 at 11:36 PM
You got facts to support that and what's the time period?
Your argument boils down to this: If saving both lives is hard, just kill one.
That’s truly barbaric.
Real progress demands we fight for solutions that protect both mother and child, not retreat into the moral cowardice of murder disguised as healthcare
That’s truly barbaric.
Real progress demands we fight for solutions that protect both mother and child, not retreat into the moral cowardice of murder disguised as healthcare
January 7, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Your argument boils down to this: If saving both lives is hard, just kill one.
That’s truly barbaric.
Real progress demands we fight for solutions that protect both mother and child, not retreat into the moral cowardice of murder disguised as healthcare
That’s truly barbaric.
Real progress demands we fight for solutions that protect both mother and child, not retreat into the moral cowardice of murder disguised as healthcare
History is full of advancements that began as “experimental” until someone had the courage to develop them. Should we have abandoned organ transplants or premature infant care because they were once “experimental”?
January 7, 2025 at 11:30 PM
History is full of advancements that began as “experimental” until someone had the courage to develop them. Should we have abandoned organ transplants or premature infant care because they were once “experimental”?
No one is forcing anyone to undergo experimental procedures—nice strawman. The point is that killing a child is never the solution, even in difficult situations. Just because medicine hasn’t caught up to God’s standard of valuing both lives doesn’t mean we abandon one to save the other..
January 7, 2025 at 11:30 PM
No one is forcing anyone to undergo experimental procedures—nice strawman. The point is that killing a child is never the solution, even in difficult situations. Just because medicine hasn’t caught up to God’s standard of valuing both lives doesn’t mean we abandon one to save the other..
I've given you zero opinion and 100% Morally Objective facts.
January 7, 2025 at 11:24 PM
I've given you zero opinion and 100% Morally Objective facts.
Abortion Bans will enforce the constitution where all men are created equal.
Wait, are you one of those extremists who don't support the constitution?!
That is 99% of the Abolitionists message. Equal Rights for all humans no matter their age, size, development, consciousness, etc.
Wait, are you one of those extremists who don't support the constitution?!
That is 99% of the Abolitionists message. Equal Rights for all humans no matter their age, size, development, consciousness, etc.
January 7, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Abortion Bans will enforce the constitution where all men are created equal.
Wait, are you one of those extremists who don't support the constitution?!
That is 99% of the Abolitionists message. Equal Rights for all humans no matter their age, size, development, consciousness, etc.
Wait, are you one of those extremists who don't support the constitution?!
That is 99% of the Abolitionists message. Equal Rights for all humans no matter their age, size, development, consciousness, etc.
I could be wrong, I'm not full of myself I've given you everything you need to do your own research. Fact check me. But I bet you won't, you'll just keep pushing for attention.
January 7, 2025 at 11:20 PM
I could be wrong, I'm not full of myself I've given you everything you need to do your own research. Fact check me. But I bet you won't, you'll just keep pushing for attention.
Kill the child for the sins of their Father. Right, that makes as much sense as all your other arguments.
There's that Ad Hominem again right on cue to prevent you from actually thinking about the life of a baby despite its circumstances of conception.
There's that Ad Hominem again right on cue to prevent you from actually thinking about the life of a baby despite its circumstances of conception.
January 7, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Kill the child for the sins of their Father. Right, that makes as much sense as all your other arguments.
There's that Ad Hominem again right on cue to prevent you from actually thinking about the life of a baby despite its circumstances of conception.
There's that Ad Hominem again right on cue to prevent you from actually thinking about the life of a baby despite its circumstances of conception.
You’re grasping at straws to justify murder, twisting Scripture to defend what God abhors. But here’s the reality, you’ll stand before the Author of life one day (Hebrews 9:27). Mock Him now if you will, but you won’t mock Him then. Repent, before it’s too late.
January 7, 2025 at 11:16 PM
You’re grasping at straws to justify murder, twisting Scripture to defend what God abhors. But here’s the reality, you’ll stand before the Author of life one day (Hebrews 9:27). Mock Him now if you will, but you won’t mock Him then. Repent, before it’s too late.
What you mock as a “herbal potion” in Numbers 5 isn’t abortion, it’s a test for adultery, where God Himself judges guilt or innocence, not man.
January 7, 2025 at 11:16 PM
What you mock as a “herbal potion” in Numbers 5 isn’t abortion, it’s a test for adultery, where God Himself judges guilt or innocence, not man.
Your ignorance of Scripture is as glaring as your disregard for truth. The Bible explicitly condemns the shedding of innocent blood (Proverbs 6:16-17) and declares that life begins at conception (Psalm 139:13-16).
January 7, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Your ignorance of Scripture is as glaring as your disregard for truth. The Bible explicitly condemns the shedding of innocent blood (Proverbs 6:16-17) and declares that life begins at conception (Psalm 139:13-16).