You can DM us in confidence, this account isn’t monitored by any retro aviation authorities (probably). -JDK
You can DM us in confidence, this account isn’t monitored by any retro aviation authorities (probably). -JDK
The casual watcher of warbirds is getting a brief intro. Not an accurate history lesson - on multiple counts.
The casual watcher of warbirds is getting a brief intro. Not an accurate history lesson - on multiple counts.
But in 1944, they were still using the standard model. And it was not capable as an air superiority fighter by then.
But in 1944, they were still using the standard model. And it was not capable as an air superiority fighter by then.
(There's also a forgotten belief that bombers were going to be hard to down, and fighters, thus less useful - so adding other roles to fighters didn't seem as a big compromise as it became.)
(There's also a forgotten belief that bombers were going to be hard to down, and fighters, thus less useful - so adding other roles to fighters didn't seem as a big compromise as it became.)
Great model and idea, too.
Great model and idea, too.
He also stopped listening a long time ago.
Of the fascism point, the current US is ticks all the criteria of the definition. You know, Tom, FACTS.
He also stopped listening a long time ago.
Of the fascism point, the current US is ticks all the criteria of the definition. You know, Tom, FACTS.
In the 'conventional modelling' element of the build, I created an inner frame structure and the inner side of the passenger door. This Fw 200's cabin was stripped out.
In the 'conventional modelling' element of the build, I created an inner frame structure and the inner side of the passenger door. This Fw 200's cabin was stripped out.