@jckuriger.bsky.social
Old school cool. Also, did anyone ever talk about him being a Robin Williams lookalike?
April 9, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Old school cool. Also, did anyone ever talk about him being a Robin Williams lookalike?
You literally immediately voted to shut the government down... You voted no on the CR... You can't have it both ways, you cowardly hypocrite. Your vote yes for cloture WAS a vote for the CR that you say was so bad. You're just too small a person to then vote yes on the actual CR, trying to save face
March 16, 2025 at 5:01 PM
You literally immediately voted to shut the government down... You voted no on the CR... You can't have it both ways, you cowardly hypocrite. Your vote yes for cloture WAS a vote for the CR that you say was so bad. You're just too small a person to then vote yes on the actual CR, trying to save face
Yea, I lost my friendly wager when I was betting refs wouldn't insert themselves into the game till late second half. Turns out it was from the first series. Oh well, grats chiefs on the win I guess. Turning it off.
February 9, 2025 at 11:52 PM
Yea, I lost my friendly wager when I was betting refs wouldn't insert themselves into the game till late second half. Turns out it was from the first series. Oh well, grats chiefs on the win I guess. Turning it off.
IMO tush push is an illegal play. Lining up and scrumming to see who can push the line more is fine, but thgo low is just a play with a min 5 chop blocks. NFL should stop being cowards and say they're gonna start calling chop blocks on that play if people do it, or just get rid of chop block rule.
January 12, 2025 at 4:28 AM
IMO tush push is an illegal play. Lining up and scrumming to see who can push the line more is fine, but thgo low is just a play with a min 5 chop blocks. NFL should stop being cowards and say they're gonna start calling chop blocks on that play if people do it, or just get rid of chop block rule.
Fact is being called for illegal sub means defense was subbing to react to offensive subs, refs effed it up and didn't hold the play for defense to sub, then called illegal sub on defense. They subbed out offensive players at 18 on play clock and refs let them quick snap at 11 on play clock...
January 12, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Fact is being called for illegal sub means defense was subbing to react to offensive subs, refs effed it up and didn't hold the play for defense to sub, then called illegal sub on defense. They subbed out offensive players at 18 on play clock and refs let them quick snap at 11 on play clock...
They were called for illegal sub, which means they *were* trying to sub, the refs didn't allow defensive sub after offense subbed is the entire point.
January 12, 2025 at 3:48 AM
They were called for illegal sub, which means they *were* trying to sub, the refs didn't allow defensive sub after offense subbed is the entire point.
They also subbed out at 18 on the play clock, and refs let them quick snap at 11 on the play clock, calling an illegal sub on defense, as if they don't know the rules of football at all.
January 12, 2025 at 3:39 AM
They also subbed out at 18 on the play clock, and refs let them quick snap at 11 on the play clock, calling an illegal sub on defense, as if they don't know the rules of football at all.
Well it says it in the embedded video caption, it's from the high winds they've been having. High winds are also a big contributing factor to fire hazard. Currently (~6:20 a.m. local west coast) have weak winds, but expected to pick up again later today.
January 9, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Well it says it in the embedded video caption, it's from the high winds they've been having. High winds are also a big contributing factor to fire hazard. Currently (~6:20 a.m. local west coast) have weak winds, but expected to pick up again later today.
Release it sure, but there should *definitely* be some redactions... releasing the same classified material that started this whole thing to the public unredacted is inherently a bad idea.
January 8, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Release it sure, but there should *definitely* be some redactions... releasing the same classified material that started this whole thing to the public unredacted is inherently a bad idea.
His main interest is because he wants to give the kickback to oil companies. It's a hedge against global warming (that they also keep saying isn't a thing), in that Greenland is going have loads of land uncovered from current ice coverage that they'll want to drill on.
January 7, 2025 at 9:39 PM
His main interest is because he wants to give the kickback to oil companies. It's a hedge against global warming (that they also keep saying isn't a thing), in that Greenland is going have loads of land uncovered from current ice coverage that they'll want to drill on.
Yeah, when the ref told the world that they were going to mark it half a yard short, then proceeded to market over a full yard short, and we didn't get that first down.... That's when I turned the game off
January 7, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Yeah, when the ref told the world that they were going to mark it half a yard short, then proceeded to market over a full yard short, and we didn't get that first down.... That's when I turned the game off
I mean, going to a club for one year before they look to transfer you back to MLS does not scream "did fine" to me.
January 4, 2025 at 3:41 PM
I mean, going to a club for one year before they look to transfer you back to MLS does not scream "did fine" to me.
So I guess that means he's done for USMNT future. Can't even cut it in Liga MX? Next.
January 3, 2025 at 3:37 AM
So I guess that means he's done for USMNT future. Can't even cut it in Liga MX? Next.
Yea and people were predicting before this season browns would end up ahead of steelers. Fact remains they're still the browns, and will still be last in the division.
January 1, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Yea and people were predicting before this season browns would end up ahead of steelers. Fact remains they're still the browns, and will still be last in the division.
Um, they've been here for 16 months. While I no longer approve of them as a gaming company and have completely severed my ties, I do approve of their first post:
December 16, 2024 at 1:11 AM
Um, they've been here for 16 months. While I no longer approve of them as a gaming company and have completely severed my ties, I do approve of their first post:
Lol yea I was about to say, don't forget the ones of idiots looking up and seeing stars apparently for the first time, or Venus, or Jupiter.
December 16, 2024 at 1:07 AM
Lol yea I was about to say, don't forget the ones of idiots looking up and seeing stars apparently for the first time, or Venus, or Jupiter.
Refs made it clear when they called two unsportsmanlike on one team and zero on the other in a full 20-man fight exactly how they were gonna call the rest of the game, and they stuck to it.
December 16, 2024 at 12:49 AM
Refs made it clear when they called two unsportsmanlike on one team and zero on the other in a full 20-man fight exactly how they were gonna call the rest of the game, and they stuck to it.
I don't understand why the league still lets them or anyone else do that. It's undeniably an illegal play. There's like six chop blocks every time they do it... The first O lineman to engage low is fine, every other one that engages that already-engaged player low is committing an illegal chop block
December 16, 2024 at 12:39 AM
I don't understand why the league still lets them or anyone else do that. It's undeniably an illegal play. There's like six chop blocks every time they do it... The first O lineman to engage low is fine, every other one that engages that already-engaged player low is committing an illegal chop block
That's correct. We'd then have 3 game lead with head-to-head. Meaning even if we lost all other 3 and they won all other 3, we'd end up with same record but still have the head-to-head tiebreaker.
If we lose to the rat birds to split and end up with same record, would go to 2nd or 3rd tiebreaker.
If we lose to the rat birds to split and end up with same record, would go to 2nd or 3rd tiebreaker.
December 9, 2024 at 3:45 PM
That's correct. We'd then have 3 game lead with head-to-head. Meaning even if we lost all other 3 and they won all other 3, we'd end up with same record but still have the head-to-head tiebreaker.
If we lose to the rat birds to split and end up with same record, would go to 2nd or 3rd tiebreaker.
If we lose to the rat birds to split and end up with same record, would go to 2nd or 3rd tiebreaker.
That's def true, but that picture of different labs is probably not the best example. We refer to those dogs differently as well. That photo has two black labs, two yellow labs, and one chocolate lab.
December 9, 2024 at 3:15 PM
That's def true, but that picture of different labs is probably not the best example. We refer to those dogs differently as well. That photo has two black labs, two yellow labs, and one chocolate lab.
