Jorge Camacho
@jcamachor.bsky.social
If you’re interested in transition design and transition studies, or in more general issues around sustainability, regeneration, and social justice, I highly recommend this book. As the title suggests, it’s a critical engagement with discourses around “abundance”, popular in the US right now. But…
November 20, 2025 at 12:59 PM
If you’re interested in transition design and transition studies, or in more general issues around sustainability, regeneration, and social justice, I highly recommend this book. As the title suggests, it’s a critical engagement with discourses around “abundance”, popular in the US right now. But…
An artifact from the present that somehow feels like both an artifact from the future and an artifact from the past.
www.msb.se/en/advice-fo...
www.msb.se/en/advice-fo...
November 21, 2024 at 10:25 PM
An artifact from the present that somehow feels like both an artifact from the future and an artifact from the past.
www.msb.se/en/advice-fo...
www.msb.se/en/advice-fo...
An additional and compatible argument would be a call to supersede both optimism and pessimism through the “tragicomic,” “scenaric stance” (J. Ogilvy) that arguably characterizes futures thinking for at least 3/4 of a century.
4/5
4/5
October 20, 2023 at 4:38 PM
An additional and compatible argument would be a call to supersede both optimism and pessimism through the “tragicomic,” “scenaric stance” (J. Ogilvy) that arguably characterizes futures thinking for at least 3/4 of a century.
4/5
4/5
The element that, for me, is most philosophically retrograde in the manifesto is the binary choice between optimism and pessimism. In his critique, Karpf calls to supersede that with techno-pragmatism.
3/5
3/5
October 20, 2023 at 4:37 PM
The element that, for me, is most philosophically retrograde in the manifesto is the binary choice between optimism and pessimism. In his critique, Karpf calls to supersede that with techno-pragmatism.
3/5
3/5