Jean-Baptiste R.
@jbrphnd.bsky.social
Smart-buildings & decarbonisation
@vaisso
Member Voices of Nuclear
@vaisso
Member Voices of Nuclear
I will help you: even the cleanest part of Australia (South Australia, 2m people on 1000k km2 land) has CO2 emissions several times higher than France (70m people on 600k km2).
Guys in their Australian bubble, playing to import chinese toys, are disconnected from real world.
Guys in their Australian bubble, playing to import chinese toys, are disconnected from real world.
July 23, 2025 at 3:15 PM
I will help you: even the cleanest part of Australia (South Australia, 2m people on 1000k km2 land) has CO2 emissions several times higher than France (70m people on 600k km2).
Guys in their Australian bubble, playing to import chinese toys, are disconnected from real world.
Guys in their Australian bubble, playing to import chinese toys, are disconnected from real world.
To be clear: even the cleanest part of Australia (South Australia, 2m people on 1000k km2 land) has CO2 emissions several times higher than France (70m people on 600k km2).
Guys in their Australian bubble, playing to import chinese toys, are disconnected from real world.
Guys in their Australian bubble, playing to import chinese toys, are disconnected from real world.
July 23, 2025 at 6:15 AM
To be clear: even the cleanest part of Australia (South Australia, 2m people on 1000k km2 land) has CO2 emissions several times higher than France (70m people on 600k km2).
Guys in their Australian bubble, playing to import chinese toys, are disconnected from real world.
Guys in their Australian bubble, playing to import chinese toys, are disconnected from real world.
Even with all these chinese toys, the South Australia (2m people on 984k km2) has several times higher emissions than France (69m people on 584k km2).
Facts are bullying you, sorry.
Facts are bullying you, sorry.
July 23, 2025 at 6:12 AM
Even with all these chinese toys, the South Australia (2m people on 984k km2) has several times higher emissions than France (69m people on 584k km2).
Facts are bullying you, sorry.
Facts are bullying you, sorry.
Wrong sources.
Flamanville was 100% paid by EDF. No loans, no special price on energy.
And EDF paid dividends every year from 2004 to 2022 while it was a public listed company.
Before that the nuclear fleet was not funded by french state. Public support get down to 0 in the 70's, after Hydro program
Flamanville was 100% paid by EDF. No loans, no special price on energy.
And EDF paid dividends every year from 2004 to 2022 while it was a public listed company.
Before that the nuclear fleet was not funded by french state. Public support get down to 0 in the 70's, after Hydro program
July 15, 2025 at 11:25 AM
Wrong sources.
Flamanville was 100% paid by EDF. No loans, no special price on energy.
And EDF paid dividends every year from 2004 to 2022 while it was a public listed company.
Before that the nuclear fleet was not funded by french state. Public support get down to 0 in the 70's, after Hydro program
Flamanville was 100% paid by EDF. No loans, no special price on energy.
And EDF paid dividends every year from 2004 to 2022 while it was a public listed company.
Before that the nuclear fleet was not funded by french state. Public support get down to 0 in the 70's, after Hydro program
Et l'autre vrai bug, lié à la gestion de Maprimrenov, c'est que le prix des PAC ne fait que monter alors qu'on a passé en 2023 les 10 millions d'unités en fonctionnement, comme le note Observ'Er.
November 24, 2024 at 7:27 AM
Et l'autre vrai bug, lié à la gestion de Maprimrenov, c'est que le prix des PAC ne fait que monter alors qu'on a passé en 2023 les 10 millions d'unités en fonctionnement, comme le note Observ'Er.