jaspreet4317.bsky.social
@jaspreet4317.bsky.social
I disagree, if government need to use techonoolgy , it should be limited , targeted and transparent
January 19, 2026 at 2:44 AM
Yes, but upto some extent , because it threatens the public privacy
January 19, 2026 at 2:41 AM
I believe Police is allowed to use this techonologie upto some extent, while it help to improve public safetly, also cause issues for privacy rights
January 19, 2026 at 2:39 AM
Do Canada’s privacy laws do enough to protect people from surveillance by the government and businesses?
January 19, 2026 at 2:34 AM
Police should only be allowed to use it with strict rules, clear limits, and strong oversight to protect people’s rights.
January 17, 2026 at 4:05 AM
No, police should not use it because facial recognition can invade privacy and may unfairly target innocent people.
January 17, 2026 at 4:04 AM
Yes, police should be allowed to use it because it can help catch dangerous criminals and keep officers and the public safer. #UCWCOMM150 @houmanmehrabian.bsky.social
January 17, 2026 at 4:04 AM
Should police be allowed to use facial recognition technology on body cameras, even if it may invade people’s privacy?
January 17, 2026 at 4:03 AM
Governments should limit or stop selling surveillance technology to countries that use it to control or harm citizens.
January 17, 2026 at 3:53 AM
U.S. tech companies should be responsible if their technology helps governments spy on people and hurt their rights.
January 17, 2026 at 3:52 AM
Surveillance technology may help with safety, but too much of it takes away privacy and personal freedom.
January 17, 2026 at 3:51 AM
Should U.S. technology companies be held legally accountable when their products enable foreign governments’ mass surveillance and human rights abuses?
January 17, 2026 at 3:40 AM