February 14, 2025 at 2:39 AM
RNZ should be deeply ashamed. I genuinely thought I'd never see the day when I'd distrust RNZ for failing due diligence in reporting.
Kiwiburn Executive Committee’s Response to Recent Media Coverage - 12/02/2025 - Kiwiburn
We are aware of recent media reports regarding inappropriate behaviour at Kiwiburn 2025. These reports stem from discussions on the Kiwiburn Facebook page, which were subsequently brought to the atten...
kiwiburn.com
February 12, 2025 at 8:31 AM
RNZ should be deeply ashamed. I genuinely thought I'd never see the day when I'd distrust RNZ for failing due diligence in reporting.
As opposed to disputing reputable information?
February 11, 2025 at 7:54 AM
As opposed to disputing reputable information?
Because the headline "community constructively seeks to address solvable issues caused by problematic minority" doesn't generate as much ad revenue
February 11, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Because the headline "community constructively seeks to address solvable issues caused by problematic minority" doesn't generate as much ad revenue
When the government fails to protect our environment, which happens regularly, EDS holds businesses and the government to account legally. They've been doing it for over 50 years with experts in law, planning, landscape and science.
February 11, 2025 at 2:49 AM
When the government fails to protect our environment, which happens regularly, EDS holds businesses and the government to account legally. They've been doing it for over 50 years with experts in law, planning, landscape and science.
Wouldn't it be amazing if ALL festivals asked attendees to report SA and did this much consent education?!!
February 11, 2025 at 12:48 AM
Wouldn't it be amazing if ALL festivals asked attendees to report SA and did this much consent education?!!
Except the "spat" has now been given more attention because a journalist has focused on who supposedly won said spat. It reads like it was written for fellow journalists, not for the public who don't have access to challenge politicians the same way and journalists are letting the public down.
February 10, 2025 at 8:28 AM
Except the "spat" has now been given more attention because a journalist has focused on who supposedly won said spat. It reads like it was written for fellow journalists, not for the public who don't have access to challenge politicians the same way and journalists are letting the public down.
That's quite a pompous take. Madeleine Chapman defending David Seymour wasn't on my 2025 bingo card. I expected a more similar article to the one you wrote last year about Luxon's boring speech at Waitangi. It would have been energy and time better directed.
February 8, 2025 at 11:19 PM
That's quite a pompous take. Madeleine Chapman defending David Seymour wasn't on my 2025 bingo card. I expected a more similar article to the one you wrote last year about Luxon's boring speech at Waitangi. It would have been energy and time better directed.