It's so funny that the Wall Street Journal published an anti-Zohran op-ed from Bernard-Henri Levy, and the first thing I find about the guy when I Google him is this:
November 2, 2025 at 9:32 AM
It's so funny that the Wall Street Journal published an anti-Zohran op-ed from Bernard-Henri Levy, and the first thing I find about the guy when I Google him is this:
This entire article is batshit insane
October 28, 2025 at 2:11 PM
This entire article is batshit insane
Or, chances are they haven't kept up with the discussions around AI. After the AMA, they decided not to use it anymore, so I guess people can change, which is nice.
October 17, 2025 at 6:04 PM
Or, chances are they haven't kept up with the discussions around AI. After the AMA, they decided not to use it anymore, so I guess people can change, which is nice.
There is another explanation
October 7, 2025 at 10:56 AM
There is another explanation
This guy? Nah, he would never
September 23, 2025 at 12:25 PM
This guy? Nah, he would never
I'm really interested in that comment on the top that's half cut out. People on the "far left" want it to be a bubble. Leftists like comrade Sam Altman, I assume.
September 7, 2025 at 7:44 AM
I'm really interested in that comment on the top that's half cut out. People on the "far left" want it to be a bubble. Leftists like comrade Sam Altman, I assume.
Don't make me tap the sign
August 26, 2025 at 7:28 AM
Don't make me tap the sign
![Wikipedia extract from the article about Betteridge's law of headlines:
"Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no." It is named after Ian Betteridge, a British technology journalist who wrote about it in 2009, although the principle is much older.[1][2] It is based on the assumption that if the publishers were confident that the answer was yes, they would have presented it as an assertion; by presenting it as a question, they are not accountable for whether it is correct or not."](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:puuveoc5dexolbsoyuwyccdy/bafkreihwebjh6uk5vmjjw4w6khepc2aedf5m4dkn6gzlqc5gwwrwmsv3x4@jpeg)
The Nick Cave version would've been wild, though.
July 22, 2025 at 4:55 PM
The Nick Cave version would've been wild, though.
From what I understand, she voted against the bill but was chastised for not voting against the amendment that MTG proposed (which is redundant since she voted against the whole thing).
July 22, 2025 at 12:24 PM
From what I understand, she voted against the bill but was chastised for not voting against the amendment that MTG proposed (which is redundant since she voted against the whole thing).
This is a hilarious example because, if you think about it, you could remove Wonder Woman from the events of BvS and the story would be exactly the same. She was only there to tease the sequels and didn't contribute anything to the plot of the movie she was in.
July 19, 2025 at 8:13 AM
This is a hilarious example because, if you think about it, you could remove Wonder Woman from the events of BvS and the story would be exactly the same. She was only there to tease the sequels and didn't contribute anything to the plot of the movie she was in.
This makes me want to firebomb a data centre....
July 15, 2025 at 1:14 PM
This makes me want to firebomb a data centre....
Finding this hidden in Clair Obscur was a reminder that the devs are having fun.
July 13, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Finding this hidden in Clair Obscur was a reminder that the devs are having fun.
The guy wasn't a Houthi. He was a civillian. There's no direct evidence of his involvement.
Also, there's nothing wrong with saying "From the river to the sea", unless you're a zionist.
Also, there's nothing wrong with saying "From the river to the sea", unless you're a zionist.
May 13, 2025 at 12:34 PM
The guy wasn't a Houthi. He was a civillian. There's no direct evidence of his involvement.
Also, there's nothing wrong with saying "From the river to the sea", unless you're a zionist.
Also, there's nothing wrong with saying "From the river to the sea", unless you're a zionist.
He's right. It was there all along:
April 18, 2025 at 10:50 AM
He's right. It was there all along:
If anyone says that getting Elon and Trump out of office will be what restores normality, remind them that what's happening right now is what the global oligarchy has wanted all along.
April 17, 2025 at 10:49 AM
If anyone says that getting Elon and Trump out of office will be what restores normality, remind them that what's happening right now is what the global oligarchy has wanted all along.