Jamie
@jarrison.bsky.social
Notice that as afraid they are of foreigners, they will let anyone saying they are self deporting board a plane with a less secure ID.
I think most terrorists planning to blow up a plane won't care if they are allowed back in the country.
I think most terrorists planning to blow up a plane won't care if they are allowed back in the country.
April 16, 2025 at 4:10 AM
Notice that as afraid they are of foreigners, they will let anyone saying they are self deporting board a plane with a less secure ID.
I think most terrorists planning to blow up a plane won't care if they are allowed back in the country.
I think most terrorists planning to blow up a plane won't care if they are allowed back in the country.
I'm all for vigorous prosecution of this, but mostly if Musk is next
April 14, 2025 at 12:36 AM
I'm all for vigorous prosecution of this, but mostly if Musk is next
But here in the US, we have a real loonie
April 10, 2025 at 8:41 AM
But here in the US, we have a real loonie
There is no doubt. Everyone should have a chance.
April 7, 2025 at 11:11 AM
There is no doubt. Everyone should have a chance.
Any lawyer actively working to punish other lawyers for offering representation to any client should be disbarred
April 4, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Any lawyer actively working to punish other lawyers for offering representation to any client should be disbarred
News flash. There is no line item veto. The executive branch doesn't have the constitutional authority to make budget cuts like this
April 4, 2025 at 12:06 AM
News flash. There is no line item veto. The executive branch doesn't have the constitutional authority to make budget cuts like this
Fiddling on the golf course while America burns
April 3, 2025 at 11:33 PM
Fiddling on the golf course while America burns
This along with tariffs that are nothing but a type of sales taxes, push the tax burden even further on to those who can least afford it
April 3, 2025 at 11:31 PM
This along with tariffs that are nothing but a type of sales taxes, push the tax burden even further on to those who can least afford it
When I was a Republican county chair in the 90s, Republicans believed in local control. This is the federal government stomping on states rights and free speech
April 3, 2025 at 11:15 PM
When I was a Republican county chair in the 90s, Republicans believed in local control. This is the federal government stomping on states rights and free speech
That would be an improvement they actually based it on trade deficits as if a small, poor country should import as much from us as we buy from them.
April 3, 2025 at 11:06 PM
That would be an improvement they actually based it on trade deficits as if a small, poor country should import as much from us as we buy from them.
We need that graffiti on the Resolute desk
April 2, 2025 at 4:33 PM
We need that graffiti on the Resolute desk
"I especially need to keep my medical benefits right now and would probably lose them if I told you what I really thought"
April 2, 2025 at 2:34 AM
"I especially need to keep my medical benefits right now and would probably lose them if I told you what I really thought"
I'm aware of Europe's good work on this. That doesn't erase the point that some types of regulation are much worse for small businesses and researchers than for huge corporations. This is the key point EFF was making here. I'm suggesting even stronger regulations, but limiting them to the big guys
March 22, 2025 at 6:09 PM
I'm aware of Europe's good work on this. That doesn't erase the point that some types of regulation are much worse for small businesses and researchers than for huge corporations. This is the key point EFF was making here. I'm suggesting even stronger regulations, but limiting them to the big guys
I shared eff's skepticism of this regulation as is. I suggested having it only apply to large firms so it wouldn't stifle research and startups. I am fine with lots of stricter regulation on the likes of Google, Amazon, Musk, Open AI, etc.
March 21, 2025 at 7:31 PM
I shared eff's skepticism of this regulation as is. I suggested having it only apply to large firms so it wouldn't stifle research and startups. I am fine with lots of stricter regulation on the likes of Google, Amazon, Musk, Open AI, etc.
I ran a tech company in the 90s too and also got out. Innovation is far from done and I don't buy Schumpeter. Change is inevitable. Neither authoritarianism nor anarchy is the best answer. Accountable, adaptable regulation based on reality rather than ideology is the best bet. I know history
March 21, 2025 at 1:31 PM
I ran a tech company in the 90s too and also got out. Innovation is far from done and I don't buy Schumpeter. Change is inevitable. Neither authoritarianism nor anarchy is the best answer. Accountable, adaptable regulation based on reality rather than ideology is the best bet. I know history
When the right talks about freedom they mean enforced conformity to right wing ideology
March 20, 2025 at 3:59 AM
When the right talks about freedom they mean enforced conformity to right wing ideology
We absolutely need small startups in every field even though most will fail, so I'm not naive, but your argument doesn't have much to offer. I am for massive regulations of the big AI firms or those that become big.
March 20, 2025 at 3:23 AM
We absolutely need small startups in every field even though most will fail, so I'm not naive, but your argument doesn't have much to offer. I am for massive regulations of the big AI firms or those that become big.
That list is only moderately accurate for tech giants. It doesn't apply to the cases eff is defending.
March 19, 2025 at 8:16 PM
That list is only moderately accurate for tech giants. It doesn't apply to the cases eff is defending.
I am sympathetic to your concerns, but the enforcement needs to be focused on the large for-profit tech giants, not small research teams. The difference between how AI makes derivative work is not significantly different from how brains work.
March 19, 2025 at 8:14 PM
I am sympathetic to your concerns, but the enforcement needs to be focused on the large for-profit tech giants, not small research teams. The difference between how AI makes derivative work is not significantly different from how brains work.
The trouble with this approach is that currently all AI information produced has human input. The design, training and prompting are human activities that are necessary to produce the results.
If the argument is that the AI is independent and creative, perhaps it should have rights.
If the argument is that the AI is independent and creative, perhaps it should have rights.
March 18, 2025 at 8:11 PM
The trouble with this approach is that currently all AI information produced has human input. The design, training and prompting are human activities that are necessary to produce the results.
If the argument is that the AI is independent and creative, perhaps it should have rights.
If the argument is that the AI is independent and creative, perhaps it should have rights.