Jared (hard "d")
banner
jaredhardd.bsky.social
Jared (hard "d")
@jaredhardd.bsky.social
🏳️‍🌈⚖️😈
he/him

📍Washington, DC
The fact these chucklefucks hate The Last Jedi really confirms my opinion that it’s the best Star Wars movie ever.
November 18, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Which I don’t believe was publicly known before?
November 18, 2025 at 4:33 AM
You’re surprised by this? All these people are vapid, amoral social climbers.
November 18, 2025 at 4:32 AM
You think *this* HR department asks questions?
Condé Nast abruptly fires 4 staffers after HR confrontation
The firings were an unsubtle message to its employee union that the publisher was taking a harder line in its dealings with employees.
www.semafor.com
November 18, 2025 at 4:30 AM
This cannot be real.
November 18, 2025 at 4:25 AM
Ok the prose was bad but that curveball? Exquisite.
November 18, 2025 at 3:01 AM
No.
November 18, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Smart, because I listen to many different tech podcasts and not a single one pronounced "Kuiper" correctly 😂
November 18, 2025 at 1:07 AM
This is a perfect example of why the post was bad—she said "the party," so no matter how you interpret that (DNC, leadership, all electeds, the voters) she can argue you just misread the post.
November 18, 2025 at 1:06 AM
She said “the party,” which is vague enough to annoy everyone while maintaining plausible deniability (and why she turned off replies).
November 17, 2025 at 11:13 PM
“Disprove?” No, I don’t think he said anything that’s capable of being proven or disproven. But it certainly undercuts the baseless accusation.
November 17, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Who’s “we?” The *voters* are supporting Platner, the actual party/establishment is supporting Mills.
November 17, 2025 at 10:48 PM
🙄
I put “harassed” in quotes because many people here believe “harassment” is “people disagreeing with me.”
November 17, 2025 at 10:33 PM
No arguments here
God it’s gonna be so delicious when this useless husk and his buddy Schmuck are finally voted out of office
November 17, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Raskin’s worst sin here is he forgot the party’s base is composed of joyless scolds who enjoy nothing more than internecine feuds.
November 17, 2025 at 10:28 PM
🤦🏼‍♂️
I put “harassed” in quotes because many people here believe “harassment” is “people disagreeing with me.”
November 17, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Editorials from whom? WaPo? Politico? Fox? I’ll be concerned when someone with a shred of credibility writes it.
November 17, 2025 at 10:24 PM
Nope, didn’t say anything remotely close to that.
I put “harassed” in quotes because many people here believe “harassment” is “people disagreeing with me.”
November 17, 2025 at 10:22 PM
🙄
I put “harassed” in quotes because many people here believe “harassment” is “people disagreeing with me.”
November 17, 2025 at 10:21 PM
The most high-profile Dem in the country is NOT Chuck Schumer 😂 it’s Obama, AOC, and/or Bernie, all of whom endorsed Mamdani. Schmuck has (sensibly) been in hiding since March.
November 17, 2025 at 10:20 PM
People here don’t understand rhetorical flourishes 😂
November 17, 2025 at 10:16 PM
That’s accurate, but (1) Raskin isn’t in leadership, (2) Raskin endorsed Mamdani, and (3) I don’t believe anyone in leadership welcomed Marge?
November 17, 2025 at 10:15 PM
I put “harassed” in quotes because many people here believe “harassment” is “people disagreeing with me.”
November 17, 2025 at 10:12 PM
It isn’t “retaliating” to remove people (unilaterally, using the executive’s SCOTUS-blessed powers) who are found to have engaged in unethical and illegal behavior.
November 17, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Reposted by Jared (hard "d")
"defense attorneys are telling us they can’t get their clients to take good or reasonable plea offers because they felt they’re better off spending their money on a political donation, drawing Trump’s attention, and getting the case dismissed or going to trial and getting a pardon."
November 17, 2025 at 2:05 PM