Dunno what Threads is like, but LinkedIn is mainly people telling me to do more with AI who happen to run AI businesses. It’s a tiresome place to be.

I might need to take this over to email

That’s a frustratingly good answer for someone who can afford a deck of cards, but doesn’t control budget to bring you in for a workshop………

But let me stew on that

Are these cards available to purchase?

I want the “remember to shut up” cards!

You mean, quite literally, “decision-based evidence-making”

This is (against my will) making me think about the Synthetic Users business model and the more I think about it the more I scratch my head. Who is it for?

It seems to be a poor fit for both people who value research, and people who do not value research.

Better idea: make the sides of the circuit out of ice!

BETTER IDEA: MAKE THE TRACK OUT OF ICE!

Actually maybe let’s just play Mario Kart

Hilariously - autocorrect fixed my “an value” and made it “a value”, completely killing the joke

“A value” just sounded like something Clarkson would say. I worked out the typo, but I also had a bonus chuckle 🙂

I think he means Albion scored championship points, Sainz booked penalty points 🤷‍♂️

The other thing they could do is add 1s to the penalty for every lap the advantage is maintained.

5s penalty now. 35s penalty if you strategically take the penalty later in the race.

The historic image here looks like muscle fibres

I mean this is basically your point 5. which is the point in most earnestly curious about.

Who benefits? And why?

The other question I have is:
- What problem would that solve?

Following any answer:
- Ok, let’s park the ID thing for a second: what other ways might we solve that problem?