Jan Schwalbach
banner
janschwalbach.bsky.social
Jan Schwalbach
@janschwalbach.bsky.social
Postdoctoral researcher at GESIS working on digital behavioral data and legislative politics
Reposted by Jan Schwalbach
On Saturday, I'll present the paper “Movement Parties and Parliamentary Speech in Chile, Spain, and Mexico”, co-authored with @eborbath.bsky.social and @janschwalbach.bsky.social ; 2pm, East Meeting Level, East 3.
September 9, 2025 at 1:58 PM
…but don't worry about your parliamentary text input during this time: already tomorrow, @lukashetzer.bsky.social and @chrauh.bsky.social will be giving an introduction to our new #parllawspeech dataset at @comptext.bsky.social \3
April 24, 2025 at 9:29 AM
For the first time in 10 years, no #parlspeech / #parllawspeech / #parl_projectos_nuevos_speech scraper will be running on my laptop for 6 months… \2
April 24, 2025 at 9:29 AM
We look at the different challenges and needs of researchers when sharing this kind of data. We cover the areas of researchers' capacities & incentives, legal & ethical challenges, and technical challenges. Furthermore, we outline potential ways forward and point to some existing solutions.
March 21, 2025 at 4:24 PM
Congrats Jihed!! Very happy for you. Hope you celebrate a lot 🍾🎉
March 1, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Reposted by Jan Schwalbach
*Introduction to Computational Text Analysis with R* by @dielea.bsky.social, @jwaeckerle.bsky.social & @janschwalbach.bsky.social.

🗓️ 01 – 03 April 2025
🏢 Online
🌐 t1p.de/comp-text-an...
January 23, 2025 at 12:17 PM
Furthermore, the results show a consistently significant positive effect of trust in the respective communication channel on the perceived credibility of a party message. 7/7
October 14, 2023 at 5:41 AM
While there is also a positive effect of the in-coalition party on the perception of credibility, it is lower compared to the in-group party. Hence, not every party that does not correspond to a voter’s intended vote choice is automatically an out-group party. 6/7
October 14, 2023 at 5:40 AM
Regarding the agreement with a statement, the information that it was made by an in-coalition party can have the same positive effect as with an in-group party in perception (if the statement does not contradict the position of the in-group party). 5/7
October 14, 2023 at 5:40 AM
While there is also a positive effect of the in-coalition party on the perception of credibility, it is lower compared to the in-group party. Hence, not every party that does not correspond to a voter’s intended vote choice is automatically an out-group party. 6/7
October 14, 2023 at 5:39 AM
Using the survey answers on voting intention and government preference, I find that the effect of the sender on the perception of statements in multiparty systems is more complex than the well-known contrasts between in-group and out-group parties in two-party systems. 4/7
October 14, 2023 at 5:37 AM