29% of the electricity in 2024 came from wind turbines, so it seems to work. As I said, renovating nuclear power plants costs many times more, their services and needs do not meet and no one wants nuclear waste... Almost every expert advises the current way.
January 13, 2025 at 9:08 AM
29% of the electricity in 2024 came from wind turbines, so it seems to work. As I said, renovating nuclear power plants costs many times more, their services and needs do not meet and no one wants nuclear waste... Almost every expert advises the current way.
Nuclear power plants produce 24/7, even if nothing is needed, so there would be massive overproduction and whats about nuclear waste disposal? That is why gas power plants were built, which can later run on hydrogen, these can compensate for the demand, but are safer and better to control
January 13, 2025 at 9:01 AM
Nuclear power plants produce 24/7, even if nothing is needed, so there would be massive overproduction and whats about nuclear waste disposal? That is why gas power plants were built, which can later run on hydrogen, these can compensate for the demand, but are safer and better to control
In addition, the nuclear power plants are from the 70s and 80s, which is why they would have to be renovated in the 2020s, something like that costs 500 million to 1 billion euros per plant. So the changeover time was well chosen
January 13, 2025 at 8:50 AM
In addition, the nuclear power plants are from the 70s and 80s, which is why they would have to be renovated in the 2020s, something like that costs 500 million to 1 billion euros per plant. So the changeover time was well chosen
But it must also be said that there was a long-term changeover plan, which provided that enough alternatives were created beforehand, but Bavaria, among other things, found wind turbines not aesthetic enough and did not adhere to it, which is why they did not comply with it.
January 13, 2025 at 8:48 AM
But it must also be said that there was a long-term changeover plan, which provided that enough alternatives were created beforehand, but Bavaria, among other things, found wind turbines not aesthetic enough and did not adhere to it, which is why they did not comply with it.
I would, some certainly. Animals are locked up, there is nothing to misinterpret, in a zoo they are prevented by barriers from moving as they would in nature. That is was ”locked up“ means.
January 13, 2025 at 8:01 AM
I would, some certainly. Animals are locked up, there is nothing to misinterpret, in a zoo they are prevented by barriers from moving as they would in nature. That is was ”locked up“ means.
And who says which zoo is accredited? Some people... but it's also not ok to lock up and show animals, just because they have enough space. You can observe primates, for example, very well that they are ashamed to be stared at, how is this taken into account?
January 13, 2025 at 7:03 AM
And who says which zoo is accredited? Some people... but it's also not ok to lock up and show animals, just because they have enough space. You can observe primates, for example, very well that they are ashamed to be stared at, how is this taken into account?
What makes the zoos different? Animals are locked up in all of them, primarily to be shown as profitably as possible, which has nothing to do with animal welfare or species conservation. People simply like polarbears more than bees. It is even so bad that many animals develop behavioural disorders.
January 13, 2025 at 6:49 AM
What makes the zoos different? Animals are locked up in all of them, primarily to be shown as profitably as possible, which has nothing to do with animal welfare or species conservation. People simply like polarbears more than bees. It is even so bad that many animals develop behavioural disorders.