@janeformonument.bsky.social
Reposted
Taking away protections for bats and newts will not make developers provide primary schools, shops, GP surgeries, community centres, playgrounds or pubs. But it will cause long term ecological damage, that in many cases will be irreversible. And it will maximise developer profits, of course.
July 27, 2025 at 12:30 PM
Taking away protections for bats and newts will not make developers provide primary schools, shops, GP surgeries, community centres, playgrounds or pubs. But it will cause long term ecological damage, that in many cases will be irreversible. And it will maximise developer profits, of course.
Reposted
Are you ready to hand more than £1,000bn to England's privatised water companies by 2050?
Shareholders don't invest. Money will be extracted from customers, shareholders will own the resulting assets and income streams and collect dividends.
Public ownership is the only sane way.
Shareholders don't invest. Money will be extracted from customers, shareholders will own the resulting assets and income streams and collect dividends.
Public ownership is the only sane way.
Public ownership is the only way to save the water industry
Public ownership is the only viable alternative but is opposed by the government
leftfootforward.org
July 27, 2025 at 9:57 AM
Are you ready to hand more than £1,000bn to England's privatised water companies by 2050?
Shareholders don't invest. Money will be extracted from customers, shareholders will own the resulting assets and income streams and collect dividends.
Public ownership is the only sane way.
Shareholders don't invest. Money will be extracted from customers, shareholders will own the resulting assets and income streams and collect dividends.
Public ownership is the only sane way.