Jamie Wood
@jamiewoodmaths.bsky.social
Maths teacher for 8 years, I now make maths revision resources for a website.
I mostly taught A level Maths & Further Maths in a sixth form, but I now produce content for all sorts of maths courses and levels.
(I am also a 32 yr old man, not a dog)
I mostly taught A level Maths & Further Maths in a sixth form, but I now produce content for all sorts of maths courses and levels.
(I am also a 32 yr old man, not a dog)
As of yesterday, as Liverpool won the league, the list of Premier League winning teams now forms a Fibonacci sequence 😎
April 28, 2025 at 10:26 AM
As of yesterday, as Liverpool won the league, the list of Premier League winning teams now forms a Fibonacci sequence 😎
This is AQA GCSE Nov 2019 Paper 3 Q27.
I think there are several cases where XY and PQ would be parallel, as there are basically no restrictions on where the vertices are. E.g. what if PQRS is a rectangle?
Any thoughts? Is this an oversight in the question?
I think there are several cases where XY and PQ would be parallel, as there are basically no restrictions on where the vertices are. E.g. what if PQRS is a rectangle?
Any thoughts? Is this an oversight in the question?
November 14, 2024 at 9:23 PM
This is AQA GCSE Nov 2019 Paper 3 Q27.
I think there are several cases where XY and PQ would be parallel, as there are basically no restrictions on where the vertices are. E.g. what if PQRS is a rectangle?
Any thoughts? Is this an oversight in the question?
I think there are several cases where XY and PQ would be parallel, as there are basically no restrictions on where the vertices are. E.g. what if PQRS is a rectangle?
Any thoughts? Is this an oversight in the question?
Thinking up names like this is honestly one of the highlights of my job
November 11, 2024 at 9:05 PM
Thinking up names like this is honestly one of the highlights of my job
I thought THIS was an apothem?!
September 23, 2024 at 5:06 PM
I thought THIS was an apothem?!
Spec is def not clear but this is from the Pearson tbook, feels like it's presented as "you should know these" (sadly). I hate having to tell them to remember stuff like this; should definitely be in the formula book IMO. (esp considering how much stuff is in there that isn't actually useful!)
September 22, 2024 at 6:20 PM
Spec is def not clear but this is from the Pearson tbook, feels like it's presented as "you should know these" (sadly). I hate having to tell them to remember stuff like this; should definitely be in the formula book IMO. (esp considering how much stuff is in there that isn't actually useful!)
Bluesky now has over 10 million users, and I was #2,405,561!
September 17, 2024 at 3:21 PM
Bluesky now has over 10 million users, and I was #2,405,561!
Been working with lots of AP Calc stuff recently and they are quite picky about their wording for graphs/functions. E.g. look at this. Notice it talks about the graph of f being concave down, rather than just f being concave down
September 6, 2024 at 9:30 AM
Been working with lots of AP Calc stuff recently and they are quite picky about their wording for graphs/functions. E.g. look at this. Notice it talks about the graph of f being concave down, rather than just f being concave down
Old spec OCR core 1 paper; a thing of beauty IMO
August 21, 2024 at 7:20 PM
Old spec OCR core 1 paper; a thing of beauty IMO
These were popular
August 18, 2024 at 9:07 PM
These were popular
It's here on android, not sure if similar on web/iOS
August 15, 2024 at 7:38 PM
It's here on android, not sure if similar on web/iOS