Jamie Stoddart
@jamiestoddart.bsky.social
Photographer who will be distracted by other interests
It is pretty much no change from Ukgov plans. I accept that Farage is worse
October 8, 2025 at 8:38 PM
It is pretty much no change from Ukgov plans. I accept that Farage is worse
That paper is an absolute travesty and their economic plans will fuck Scotland over.
October 8, 2025 at 4:13 PM
That paper is an absolute travesty and their economic plans will fuck Scotland over.
The “offices of state” of England did become the offices of state for GB. However, Scottish “government” largely continued as it had before without the MPs representing Scotland in the union parliament having input.
If England annexed Scotland it would have done so as it did to Wales in 1542
If England annexed Scotland it would have done so as it did to Wales in 1542
September 20, 2025 at 4:02 PM
The “offices of state” of England did become the offices of state for GB. However, Scottish “government” largely continued as it had before without the MPs representing Scotland in the union parliament having input.
If England annexed Scotland it would have done so as it did to Wales in 1542
If England annexed Scotland it would have done so as it did to Wales in 1542
My only issue with this article ( www.lawscot.org.uk/members/jour... ) written by a now deceased legal expert is the assertion both kingdoms were extinguished & Great Britain became the state.
🏴 wouldn’t give up its freedom & Queen Anne & the estates couldn’t end 🏴 or make it subservient to 🏴
🏴 wouldn’t give up its freedom & Queen Anne & the estates couldn’t end 🏴 or make it subservient to 🏴
The Union and the law | Law Society of Scotland
www.lawscot.org.uk
September 20, 2025 at 3:00 PM
My only issue with this article ( www.lawscot.org.uk/members/jour... ) written by a now deceased legal expert is the assertion both kingdoms were extinguished & Great Britain became the state.
🏴 wouldn’t give up its freedom & Queen Anne & the estates couldn’t end 🏴 or make it subservient to 🏴
🏴 wouldn’t give up its freedom & Queen Anne & the estates couldn’t end 🏴 or make it subservient to 🏴
Except he has ignored the actual process of the union and what happened constitutionally
September 20, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Except he has ignored the actual process of the union and what happened constitutionally
But what if the historical facts counter this
September 20, 2025 at 2:07 PM
But what if the historical facts counter this
I genuinely believe he is wrong, just as those who provided legal opinion to Ukgov in 2012 did just to provide it with proof it would be the continuing state
September 20, 2025 at 2:04 PM
I genuinely believe he is wrong, just as those who provided legal opinion to Ukgov in 2012 did just to provide it with proof it would be the continuing state
I think this is a problem both sides have as legal opinion provided to Ukgov in 2012 erroneously stated England annexed Scotland which backs up the colony viewpoint. On the other hand the facts show something entirely different where both kingdoms continue & retained their constitutions & rights
September 20, 2025 at 11:40 AM
I think this is a problem both sides have as legal opinion provided to Ukgov in 2012 erroneously stated England annexed Scotland which backs up the colony viewpoint. On the other hand the facts show something entirely different where both kingdoms continue & retained their constitutions & rights
Pete, I’m genuinely curious to see what your take on the history of the union and what is meant constitutionally for Scotland is?
I disagree with the view 🏴 is a colony, but it has been treated like one & I applaud the group for trying something
I disagree with the view 🏴 is a colony, but it has been treated like one & I applaud the group for trying something
September 20, 2025 at 10:13 AM
Pete, I’m genuinely curious to see what your take on the history of the union and what is meant constitutionally for Scotland is?
I disagree with the view 🏴 is a colony, but it has been treated like one & I applaud the group for trying something
I disagree with the view 🏴 is a colony, but it has been treated like one & I applaud the group for trying something
The it’s very complex as people joined the colonial effort for a variety of reasons whilst Scotland was treated like a colony at the same time. The rich and powerful didn’t stand up for Scotland at any time
January 30, 2025 at 10:30 PM
The it’s very complex as people joined the colonial effort for a variety of reasons whilst Scotland was treated like a colony at the same time. The rich and powerful didn’t stand up for Scotland at any time
Scotland had no public debt at the time of the union. England on the other hand was screwed & in a major recession in 1705. That national debt = up to £640bn today
January 30, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Scotland had no public debt at the time of the union. England on the other hand was screwed & in a major recession in 1705. That national debt = up to £640bn today
It was Queen Anne who agreed the treaty of union & ratified it at a ceremony on the 23rd of July 1706. The parliaments only put the terms into domestic law
December 15, 2024 at 5:46 PM
It was Queen Anne who agreed the treaty of union & ratified it at a ceremony on the 23rd of July 1706. The parliaments only put the terms into domestic law
Most money is actually form the govt buying goods & services. You are right that banks acting as agents for the govt (who has allowed them to do this) also create £s but their reserves are held at BoE & they get billions for free from Ukgov too
November 26, 2024 at 1:28 PM
Most money is actually form the govt buying goods & services. You are right that banks acting as agents for the govt (who has allowed them to do this) also create £s but their reserves are held at BoE & they get billions for free from Ukgov too
Where do you think all the money in the economy came from? I’ll give you a hint not the private sector
November 26, 2024 at 1:24 PM
Where do you think all the money in the economy came from? I’ll give you a hint not the private sector
Sorry I misread the paragraph as it is you saying there is no problem of the govt spends more. My responses are still valid though
November 26, 2024 at 1:22 PM
Sorry I misread the paragraph as it is you saying there is no problem of the govt spends more. My responses are still valid though
You also tie the creation of new £ in with what is expected to be collected by tax. What they collect & destroy is irrelevant.
November 26, 2024 at 1:20 PM
You also tie the creation of new £ in with what is expected to be collected by tax. What they collect & destroy is irrelevant.
You reference MMTers saying there’s no issue if the govt prints new £ to spend. This is not true on 2 points.
1. The BoE marks up specific accounts to enable payment.
2. Ukgov needs to be aware of the availability of real resources as spending willy billy when resources aren’t available inflation ⬆️
1. The BoE marks up specific accounts to enable payment.
2. Ukgov needs to be aware of the availability of real resources as spending willy billy when resources aren’t available inflation ⬆️
November 26, 2024 at 1:11 PM
You reference MMTers saying there’s no issue if the govt prints new £ to spend. This is not true on 2 points.
1. The BoE marks up specific accounts to enable payment.
2. Ukgov needs to be aware of the availability of real resources as spending willy billy when resources aren’t available inflation ⬆️
1. The BoE marks up specific accounts to enable payment.
2. Ukgov needs to be aware of the availability of real resources as spending willy billy when resources aren’t available inflation ⬆️
I did read it, but it has so many flaws
November 26, 2024 at 1:05 PM
I did read it, but it has so many flaws
I see your problem. You believe taxes & “borrowing” fund a fiat currency issuing govts spending. This is not true & is even more damaging for the poorest in society.
November 26, 2024 at 7:12 AM
I see your problem. You believe taxes & “borrowing” fund a fiat currency issuing govts spending. This is not true & is even more damaging for the poorest in society.
MMT is not a policy. How would it damage the poorest people?
November 26, 2024 at 6:47 AM
MMT is not a policy. How would it damage the poorest people?
Of course scotgov could just be a fiat currency issuer which means its tax revenue would not be used to fund services. Instead those taxes would encourage the mega rich not to hoard or be used to encourage certain behaviours
November 25, 2024 at 10:13 PM
Of course scotgov could just be a fiat currency issuer which means its tax revenue would not be used to fund services. Instead those taxes would encourage the mega rich not to hoard or be used to encourage certain behaviours
No it didn’t. Why? The ToU was an international treaty agreed by Queen Anne in her 2 different roles. She did this for 🏴 under the prerogative act 1661 ( still on statute book) that delegated authority to the king / queen of Scot’s to enter treaties.
November 24, 2024 at 8:40 PM
No it didn’t. Why? The ToU was an international treaty agreed by Queen Anne in her 2 different roles. She did this for 🏴 under the prerogative act 1661 ( still on statute book) that delegated authority to the king / queen of Scot’s to enter treaties.