James Wilsdon
@jameswilsdon.bsky.social
undisciplined metascientist | executive director, Research on Research Institute @RoRInstitute.bsky.social | professor of research policy, UCL
Reposted by James Wilsdon
100% agree with Dr. Nosek that metascience should not become a discipline; back in 2023 it was call a "movement" and this year @jameswilsdon.bsky.social and others called it a "discourse coalition".
All the discourse that wants to gather under this label should do so imo.
bsky.app/profile/bria...
All the discourse that wants to gather under this label should do so imo.
bsky.app/profile/bria...
One instinct that I keep is a hope that metascience does not become a discipline of its own.
Disciplines get too monocultural and self-referential. The most exciting part of metascience is that it feels a bit disorienting because of the diversity in discipline, sectors, assumptions coming together.
Disciplines get too monocultural and self-referential. The most exciting part of metascience is that it feels a bit disorienting because of the diversity in discipline, sectors, assumptions coming together.
July 4, 2025 at 12:38 PM
100% agree with Dr. Nosek that metascience should not become a discipline; back in 2023 it was call a "movement" and this year @jameswilsdon.bsky.social and others called it a "discourse coalition".
All the discourse that wants to gather under this label should do so imo.
bsky.app/profile/bria...
All the discourse that wants to gather under this label should do so imo.
bsky.app/profile/bria...
Reposted by James Wilsdon
One instinct that I keep is a hope that metascience does not become a discipline of its own.
Disciplines get too monocultural and self-referential. The most exciting part of metascience is that it feels a bit disorienting because of the diversity in discipline, sectors, assumptions coming together.
Disciplines get too monocultural and self-referential. The most exciting part of metascience is that it feels a bit disorienting because of the diversity in discipline, sectors, assumptions coming together.
July 4, 2025 at 12:27 PM
One instinct that I keep is a hope that metascience does not become a discipline of its own.
Disciplines get too monocultural and self-referential. The most exciting part of metascience is that it feels a bit disorienting because of the diversity in discipline, sectors, assumptions coming together.
Disciplines get too monocultural and self-referential. The most exciting part of metascience is that it feels a bit disorienting because of the diversity in discipline, sectors, assumptions coming together.
🙏🏻 thanks Ryuichi — and sorry we didn’t get a chance to talk more! I was v. pleased that Ueyama-sensei was able to join us, so we could give more profile to ongoing & potential developments in Japanese metascience!
July 4, 2025 at 7:39 AM
🙏🏻 thanks Ryuichi — and sorry we didn’t get a chance to talk more! I was v. pleased that Ueyama-sensei was able to join us, so we could give more profile to ongoing & potential developments in Japanese metascience!