Agreed. AI's potential is huge, but ethical, human-centered development is crucial. It should augment, not replace, human creativity and connection. Tech that isolates or devalues arts misses the point. Let's prioritize AI that enriches human experience, like your fun examples!

Meta’s AI vision automates content and interactions, replacing human input with AI-generated media. It’s less a leap into the future than an extension of existing optimization for engagement, attention, and ad targeting.

Meta’s AI vision automates content and interactions, replacing human input with AI-generated media. It’s less a leap into the future than an extension of existing optimization for engagement, attention, and ad targeting.

Meta’s AI vision automates content and interactions, replacing human input with AI-generated media. It’s less a leap into the future than an extension of existing optimization for engagement, attention, and ad targeting.

That’s a sharp observation. If vendors oversell AI's capabilities and minimize the need for human oversight, liability seems inevitable. The question is, will the blame fall on the vendors, the firms using the tools, or both? Oversight is key to avoiding these pitfalls.

Automated decision-making must prioritize accountability for harm caused by errors like hallucinations. Devs and operators need clear safeguards to protect users. Transparency and ethical oversight are key to building trust and ensuring fair outcomes.

Great point—AI in healthcare has huge potential, but without strong oversight, the risks are alarming. The case you mention shows the need for stricter regulations and ethical frameworks to prioritize patient safety. What’s the first step: better laws, transparency, or accountability?