I saw a heap of results with radarr

I love my rowing machine. You should definitely do it!

The only thing I miss is hamstring curls and pull downs (I’m rather heavy for pull ups). My functional trainer is really versatile and has a squat rack which goes up to 154kg (plenty enough at my age). It’s taken me years to put it all together.

I gave up on the public gym and bought my own.

CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!

Super happy for you mate!

I doubt many people seeing that post will understand the significance, but AFAIK no other #dotnet library can both render glyphs like this with real brushes and return layer-aware glyph paths you can fill/stroke programmatically.

This is really freaking cool!

Uncanny!

That’s the stuff missing from NETFX

That’s very kind. I think my AI enhanced hack attempt is working. Public I figured out on my own but private was more complicated.

I’ll clean up and do more testing and let you know know.

I am surprised the methods weren’t shipped out of band as extensions though!

You can create and register custom Scheme. You can then document the Authorize attribute with the scheme you want to use. For Hangfire dashboard I would just check the user is authenticated. The default scheme should handle that.

The abstractions are good, and work well and everything in hindsight makes perfect sense, however the journey to get to that point is far too difficult. I think the docs would benefit from some sort of flowchart + recipe approach.

ImageSharp has long supported all compression options for JPEG, and other formats also. It also does some clever optimisations for animated image formats that perform deduplication of pixel data across frames. For V4 it’ll also have normalisation of ICC profiles to allow additional savings

BTW. What do you mean by "beats it"?
In what way do you think a free C library wrapper outperforms ImageSharp? Speed? Features? Reliability? Cross-platform support?

Happy to clarify where ImageSharp stands; just want to understand what you're comparing.

ImageSharp is fully managed, cross-platform, actively developed, and solves real-world problems enterprises face.

If your only metric is "what’s free," open source will always lose.
But teams paying for ImageSharp get better performance, fewer bugs, and active support. That's worth something.

I get where you're coming from, but this is a false equivalence.
System.Drawing was Windows-only, incomplete, and is now deprecated.
SkiaSharp is a wrapper over a C++ library with its own limitations and maintenance risks.

Can you be more specific as to why?