benjamins.com/catalog/ni.3...

Great quote, thank you for sharing it, Timothy.

It seems to me that with Garfinkel and Sacks, it was indeed the case that the "master" also learned much from the "successor".

Enjoy the archive, if you are there now!

“hidden in the foliage”

I'd also highly recommend reading some of Sacks' Lectures on Conversation, published posthumously in 1992 -- they don't have the formalism that Stuart pointed out and that was somewhat characteristic of Sacks' papers published during his lifetime...

Yes, and the EM part is Ethnomethodology.
The screenshot in Mark's post is from the groundbreaking article by Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson titled "A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation" (1974).
www.jstor.org/stable/412243

The previous one listed in the EMCA Wiki bibliography database (out of 23 in total) was published in 2010: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Thank you! Indeed, we spent much time discussing the "provability" of poetic phenomena -- this seems to be one of the main challenges, and we only scratched the surface in the present paper.

Many thanks for the suggestions, of course, not everything can fit in one paper and we tried to keep our focus rather narrow in this one...

Now I remembered what actually prompted the paper -- it was this footnote in our previous article. We realized that such "footnoting" is a characteristically predominant way of dealing with poetics and wanted to explore that further.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Thank you, Marina! Well, I am not quite sure about the prompt anymore :) But I believe there was first an interest in 'poetics' as such, and in the notion of the 'wild'. After a while, we decided to focus more closely on transcription of 'sound patterns' as a case in point...

Thank you!

It's been around for a while too... From Sacks' Lectures (p. 385):

Several years ago I had a short project observing such practices in a shared office space :)

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....