Jake
@jake2500.com
It sounds like it's more a rolling window of participants. I think what's more worrying is a 12 year old joins the trial, gets blockers for 2 years. Is now 14 and no longer actively participating in the trial. What happens? Do they lose access to puberty blockers? Can they get any other care?
November 22, 2025 at 2:18 PM
It sounds like it's more a rolling window of participants. I think what's more worrying is a 12 year old joins the trial, gets blockers for 2 years. Is now 14 and no longer actively participating in the trial. What happens? Do they lose access to puberty blockers? Can they get any other care?
Given the EHRC is captured by them, I think they adopted the consultation submissions by the extremist hate groups.
One of the submissions I've seen say ID is "unreliable" and that "duty-bearers should make the best assessment they can with the available information".🤮
Sounds the same as the leak.
One of the submissions I've seen say ID is "unreliable" and that "duty-bearers should make the best assessment they can with the available information".🤮
Sounds the same as the leak.
November 20, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Given the EHRC is captured by them, I think they adopted the consultation submissions by the extremist hate groups.
One of the submissions I've seen say ID is "unreliable" and that "duty-bearers should make the best assessment they can with the available information".🤮
Sounds the same as the leak.
One of the submissions I've seen say ID is "unreliable" and that "duty-bearers should make the best assessment they can with the available information".🤮
Sounds the same as the leak.
“Courts minister says change needed to stop criminals opting for juries to delay cases”
And I thought we had a presumption of innocence in this country. A show trial would be even faster.
And I thought we had a presumption of innocence in this country. A show trial would be even faster.
November 20, 2025 at 12:05 PM
“Courts minister says change needed to stop criminals opting for juries to delay cases”
And I thought we had a presumption of innocence in this country. A show trial would be even faster.
And I thought we had a presumption of innocence in this country. A show trial would be even faster.
The gap between the minister and the EHRC might be explained by them not expecting the EHRC to double down on their transphobia and offer no justification for mandatory exclusion.
It's hard to appear neutral when one side is driving off a cliff.
It's hard to appear neutral when one side is driving off a cliff.
November 18, 2025 at 10:34 AM
The gap between the minister and the EHRC might be explained by them not expecting the EHRC to double down on their transphobia and offer no justification for mandatory exclusion.
It's hard to appear neutral when one side is driving off a cliff.
It's hard to appear neutral when one side is driving off a cliff.
Oh no, the great time sink has been opened!
November 15, 2025 at 11:58 AM
Oh no, the great time sink has been opened!
TIL Britain has been living in a unfeasible and unworkable toilet reality for the past 14 years.
I'd love to know what the EHRC's "objective criteria" are.
I'd love to know what the EHRC's "objective criteria" are.
November 13, 2025 at 6:05 PM
TIL Britain has been living in a unfeasible and unworkable toilet reality for the past 14 years.
I'd love to know what the EHRC's "objective criteria" are.
I'd love to know what the EHRC's "objective criteria" are.
And they didn't remove it because there was anything wrong with it. They stand by it.
November 13, 2025 at 5:04 PM
And they didn't remove it because there was anything wrong with it. They stand by it.
It's not first-hand knowledge unfortunately, but apparently Kirkpatrick's 2nd witness statement says
"the EHRC Board considered that a further step in its strategy to encourage the Minister to urgently progress publication of the draft Code would be to remove the webpage housing the Interim Update"
"the EHRC Board considered that a further step in its strategy to encourage the Minister to urgently progress publication of the draft Code would be to remove the webpage housing the Interim Update"
November 13, 2025 at 5:01 PM
It's not first-hand knowledge unfortunately, but apparently Kirkpatrick's 2nd witness statement says
"the EHRC Board considered that a further step in its strategy to encourage the Minister to urgently progress publication of the draft Code would be to remove the webpage housing the Interim Update"
"the EHRC Board considered that a further step in its strategy to encourage the Minister to urgently progress publication of the draft Code would be to remove the webpage housing the Interim Update"
If it's "science", can it be a protected philosophical belief 🤔
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/1...
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/1...
Equality Act 2010 - Explanatory Notes
www.legislation.gov.uk
November 10, 2025 at 8:44 PM
If it's "science", can it be a protected philosophical belief 🤔
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/1...
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/1...
How could they have seen this coming? If only someone had warned them... anyone... multiple times... for years... A truly unforeseeable consequence.
\s
\s
November 9, 2025 at 7:31 PM
How could they have seen this coming? If only someone had warned them... anyone... multiple times... for years... A truly unforeseeable consequence.
\s
\s
Wow, that hilarious! The judge effectively implying she isn’t an expert. 🤡
November 9, 2025 at 12:12 AM
Wow, that hilarious! The judge effectively implying she isn’t an expert. 🤡
The EHRC seem to be implicitly framing it like GANHRI rejected the submissions. Glad that’s not true.
November 7, 2025 at 6:10 PM
The EHRC seem to be implicitly framing it like GANHRI rejected the submissions. Glad that’s not true.
It's also important that she was quoting a person. She incorporated her own bias and change Malcolm Mistry's words while reading the news.
Totally unacceptable.
Totally unacceptable.
November 6, 2025 at 6:17 PM
It's also important that she was quoting a person. She incorporated her own bias and change Malcolm Mistry's words while reading the news.
Totally unacceptable.
Totally unacceptable.
In the recording of his arrest that *he released*, he also doubled down and said to the officers that they should kick trans people using the toilets. It clearly wasn’t a joke.
October 26, 2025 at 11:24 AM
In the recording of his arrest that *he released*, he also doubled down and said to the officers that they should kick trans people using the toilets. It clearly wasn’t a joke.
Yeah, I’m sure the conservative manifesto authors would’ve blushed at including some stuff actually happening now
October 20, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Yeah, I’m sure the conservative manifesto authors would’ve blushed at including some stuff actually happening now
Labour even failing to be the lesser of two evils when they just do all the evils.
October 19, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Labour even failing to be the lesser of two evils when they just do all the evils.
The conservatives’ manifesto promised:
Make the puberty blocker ban permanent - done ✅
Ban the private prescription of puberty blockers - done ✅
Redefine gender/sex in The Equality Act based on “biological sex” (🤮) - done (thanks SC) ✅
Ban teaching “gender ideology” to children - done ✅
Make the puberty blocker ban permanent - done ✅
Ban the private prescription of puberty blockers - done ✅
Redefine gender/sex in The Equality Act based on “biological sex” (🤮) - done (thanks SC) ✅
Ban teaching “gender ideology” to children - done ✅
October 19, 2025 at 11:55 PM
The conservatives’ manifesto promised:
Make the puberty blocker ban permanent - done ✅
Ban the private prescription of puberty blockers - done ✅
Redefine gender/sex in The Equality Act based on “biological sex” (🤮) - done (thanks SC) ✅
Ban teaching “gender ideology” to children - done ✅
Make the puberty blocker ban permanent - done ✅
Ban the private prescription of puberty blockers - done ✅
Redefine gender/sex in The Equality Act based on “biological sex” (🤮) - done (thanks SC) ✅
Ban teaching “gender ideology” to children - done ✅
Not only did they lie and have not implement the barely positive promises they made in their manifesto, they have implemented EVERY anti-trans manifesto commitment the Conservative Party made and more!!!
October 19, 2025 at 11:46 PM
Not only did they lie and have not implement the barely positive promises they made in their manifesto, they have implemented EVERY anti-trans manifesto commitment the Conservative Party made and more!!!
My understanding is you are correct. We *all* have the right as individuals to not be discriminated against. There are allowed exceptions under certain circumstances.
“Group based rights” creates a legal hierarchy of people. That’s the path to a dark place.
“Group based rights” creates a legal hierarchy of people. That’s the path to a dark place.
October 19, 2025 at 9:47 AM
My understanding is you are correct. We *all* have the right as individuals to not be discriminated against. There are allowed exceptions under certain circumstances.
“Group based rights” creates a legal hierarchy of people. That’s the path to a dark place.
“Group based rights” creates a legal hierarchy of people. That’s the path to a dark place.
There wasn’t a gender as a game mechanic, but we had Nidorina and Nidoran, given different Pokédex entries. The rest were presumably unknown at the time.
My personal in-universe canon is they discovered more Pokemon genders between Gen 1 and Gen 2, and it’s an active area of study.
My personal in-universe canon is they discovered more Pokemon genders between Gen 1 and Gen 2, and it’s an active area of study.
October 19, 2025 at 8:16 AM
There wasn’t a gender as a game mechanic, but we had Nidorina and Nidoran, given different Pokédex entries. The rest were presumably unknown at the time.
My personal in-universe canon is they discovered more Pokemon genders between Gen 1 and Gen 2, and it’s an active area of study.
My personal in-universe canon is they discovered more Pokemon genders between Gen 1 and Gen 2, and it’s an active area of study.
Yep! There was oral questions to The Government in The House of Lords yesterday on the code of practice and EHRC's letter.
parliamentlive.tv/event/index/...
parliamentlive.tv/event/index/...
Parliamentlive.tv
House of Lords
parliamentlive.tv
October 16, 2025 at 9:59 AM
Yep! There was oral questions to The Government in The House of Lords yesterday on the code of practice and EHRC's letter.
parliamentlive.tv/event/index/...
parliamentlive.tv/event/index/...
anti-rights *extremist* hate groups www.gov.uk/government/p...
New definition of extremism (2024)
www.gov.uk
October 16, 2025 at 8:47 AM
anti-rights *extremist* hate groups www.gov.uk/government/p...
Oh, you said supportive. Lord Cashman?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael...
October 15, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Oh, you said supportive. Lord Cashman?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael...
Falkner said "We were asked to provide the EIA last Friday. We provided it to the Government on Monday".
October 15, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Falkner said "We were asked to provide the EIA last Friday. We provided it to the Government on Monday".