With 95% of the public still on the sidelines of AI awareness and 85% of Americans distrusting developers to self-govern, trust is shaping up to be both the barrier to entry and the key to mass adoption.
5/x
#SXSW2025 #TrustedAI
5/x
#SXSW2025 #TrustedAI
March 19, 2025 at 9:52 PM
With 95% of the public still on the sidelines of AI awareness and 85% of Americans distrusting developers to self-govern, trust is shaping up to be both the barrier to entry and the key to mass adoption.
5/x
#SXSW2025 #TrustedAI
5/x
#SXSW2025 #TrustedAI
With affordable AI models now within reach for medium-sized businesses (and likely SMEs soon), trust is becoming the key market differentiator. The question isn’t just about performance anymore—it’s "Who Can You Trust?"
4/x
4/x
March 19, 2025 at 9:50 PM
With affordable AI models now within reach for medium-sized businesses (and likely SMEs soon), trust is becoming the key market differentiator. The question isn’t just about performance anymore—it’s "Who Can You Trust?"
4/x
4/x
Rather, it will come from something we’ve mastered over centuries: innovations in corporate governance.
Recent AI breakthroughs—like DeepSeek—prove that cost is no longer the biggest barrier to entry for high-performing models.
3/x
Recent AI breakthroughs—like DeepSeek—prove that cost is no longer the biggest barrier to entry for high-performing models.
3/x
March 19, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Rather, it will come from something we’ve mastered over centuries: innovations in corporate governance.
Recent AI breakthroughs—like DeepSeek—prove that cost is no longer the biggest barrier to entry for high-performing models.
3/x
Recent AI breakthroughs—like DeepSeek—prove that cost is no longer the biggest barrier to entry for high-performing models.
3/x
Turnout was amazing, and the audience's questions were sharp and insightful (no surprise there).
My answer? “Yes, but.” I agree with David Runciman, who argues in The Handover that managing AI’s impact won’t come only from tweaking tech or changing human nature.
2/x
#sxsw2025 #ethicalAI
My answer? “Yes, but.” I agree with David Runciman, who argues in The Handover that managing AI’s impact won’t come only from tweaking tech or changing human nature.
2/x
#sxsw2025 #ethicalAI
March 19, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Turnout was amazing, and the audience's questions were sharp and insightful (no surprise there).
My answer? “Yes, but.” I agree with David Runciman, who argues in The Handover that managing AI’s impact won’t come only from tweaking tech or changing human nature.
2/x
#sxsw2025 #ethicalAI
My answer? “Yes, but.” I agree with David Runciman, who argues in The Handover that managing AI’s impact won’t come only from tweaking tech or changing human nature.
2/x
#sxsw2025 #ethicalAI
I see what you did there
December 15, 2024 at 2:57 PM
I see what you did there
Possible, perhaps even probable. But it's an important question to ask of anyone proposing to re-set the rules. It is also not impossible that, ironically, he is not even aware of this disqualifying assumption. An ethical framework based upon power, after all, cannot be improved by technology.
December 7, 2024 at 3:53 PM
Possible, perhaps even probable. But it's an important question to ask of anyone proposing to re-set the rules. It is also not impossible that, ironically, he is not even aware of this disqualifying assumption. An ethical framework based upon power, after all, cannot be improved by technology.
Serious question for Patrick Soon-Shiong. If “bias” is - threat to his paper, would he agree that his biases may contribute to the problem? Or, as owner and person whose views could impact the product the most, should they be exempt? Ought the most powerful person also be the gatekeeper?
December 7, 2024 at 3:06 PM
Serious question for Patrick Soon-Shiong. If “bias” is - threat to his paper, would he agree that his biases may contribute to the problem? Or, as owner and person whose views could impact the product the most, should they be exempt? Ought the most powerful person also be the gatekeeper?