jacub.bsky.social
@jacub.bsky.social
This guy is here arguing that tRF clearly means the US military.
So, while everyone else is arguing about whether P can call up the NG if ICE and CBP can’t do their jobs, this guy is like “no, you can only call in the NG if the whole damn Department of Defense is insufficient“
So, while everyone else is arguing about whether P can call up the NG if ICE and CBP can’t do their jobs, this guy is like “no, you can only call in the NG if the whole damn Department of Defense is insufficient“
October 30, 2025 at 12:01 AM
This guy is here arguing that tRF clearly means the US military.
So, while everyone else is arguing about whether P can call up the NG if ICE and CBP can’t do their jobs, this guy is like “no, you can only call in the NG if the whole damn Department of Defense is insufficient“
So, while everyone else is arguing about whether P can call up the NG if ICE and CBP can’t do their jobs, this guy is like “no, you can only call in the NG if the whole damn Department of Defense is insufficient“
Of the screenshot:
The statute that allows POTUS to federalize the Ntl Guard only allows it if P is “unable“ to execute the laws with “the regular forces“. Everybody else has been arguing about what “unable” means, taking for granted that “the regular forces” includes law enforcement.
The statute that allows POTUS to federalize the Ntl Guard only allows it if P is “unable“ to execute the laws with “the regular forces“. Everybody else has been arguing about what “unable” means, taking for granted that “the regular forces” includes law enforcement.
October 30, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Of the screenshot:
The statute that allows POTUS to federalize the Ntl Guard only allows it if P is “unable“ to execute the laws with “the regular forces“. Everybody else has been arguing about what “unable” means, taking for granted that “the regular forces” includes law enforcement.
The statute that allows POTUS to federalize the Ntl Guard only allows it if P is “unable“ to execute the laws with “the regular forces“. Everybody else has been arguing about what “unable” means, taking for granted that “the regular forces” includes law enforcement.
Surprise!
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/w...
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/w...
Trinidadian Family Says U.S. Military Killed Relative in Boat Attack
www.nytimes.com
October 18, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Surprise!
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/w...
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/w...
It’s also not a criminal statute. Nor does it directly relate to any.
September 28, 2025 at 3:48 PM
It’s also not a criminal statute. Nor does it directly relate to any.
The fear is the point
March 28, 2025 at 2:02 PM
The fear is the point
Does this system deliver pay to members of the military? To defense contractors? I assume so, based only on how it's described in this article. It could be that control of this system ends up being the whole ballgame.
January 31, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Does this system deliver pay to members of the military? To defense contractors? I assume so, based only on how it's described in this article. It could be that control of this system ends up being the whole ballgame.