Quite the arc

And here's the tweet that became the essay:

Here's the abstract. It's a strange moment in which to describe any administrative-law content as fun, but . . . I think this one is kind of fun? In a disturbing way?

Hard look review, post-Ohio v. EPA:

Delighted to share – several months late – that my article Justifying Redistributive Regulations will be published later this year in the Michigan Journal of Law Reform and that the current draft is up on @ssrn.bsky.social: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

I’m nevertheless *thrilled* to be joining UConn Law as an Associate Professor. Hello, Hartford!

EPA acknowledged that there would also be ozone, PM, HAP reductions, but it couldn't monetize them.

EPA's 2016 oil and gas NSPS also relied on the social cost of methane to show monetized net benefits. www.regulations.gov/document/EPA...