@j238nyc.bsky.social
A lot of kids see warning labels as enticements.
December 31, 2025 at 1:56 PM
A lot of kids see warning labels as enticements.
"family-friendly."
You want children to see that. 🙁
You want children to see that. 🙁
October 13, 2025 at 11:08 PM
"family-friendly."
You want children to see that. 🙁
You want children to see that. 🙁
No matter what you say, minors are protected from tobacco and alcohol, and, for the same reason, they should be protected from life-altering elective medical treatments.
October 13, 2025 at 8:02 PM
No matter what you say, minors are protected from tobacco and alcohol, and, for the same reason, they should be protected from life-altering elective medical treatments.
I think there are enough LGBTQ books for children. Of course, none of this can turn kids gay.🙄
June 13, 2025 at 4:06 PM
I think there are enough LGBTQ books for children. Of course, none of this can turn kids gay.🙄
I'm sure you can rationalize all of this.
nypost.com/2025/06/03/u...
nypost.com/2025/06/03/u...
Track, soccer, basketball and more: The trans athlete scandals that rocked high school sports this year, from NY to California
Trans athletes have been dominating girls’ sports — with more than a dozen cases documented just this high school year.
nypost.com
June 8, 2025 at 1:53 PM
I'm sure you can rationalize all of this.
nypost.com/2025/06/03/u...
nypost.com/2025/06/03/u...
Also, I promise you, I would say the same to a woman.
May 6, 2025 at 1:06 PM
Also, I promise you, I would say the same to a woman.
Talk to someone you trust about this.
May 6, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Talk to someone you trust about this.
These episodes made them criminals. You are unaware how you were exploited.
May 5, 2025 at 9:37 PM
These episodes made them criminals. You are unaware how you were exploited.
Hate to see Gov. Hochul sign off on Lee Zeldin's backwards agenda. @governor.ny.gov
May 1, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Hate to see Gov. Hochul sign off on Lee Zeldin's backwards agenda. @governor.ny.gov
Opening words are a difficult-to-diagram sentence. Never a good way to start.
April 14, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Opening words are a difficult-to-diagram sentence. Never a good way to start.
Is there any metric you would find meaningful on this matter?
April 14, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Is there any metric you would find meaningful on this matter?
Not arguing, but that's less like a bribe & more like a ransom.
April 13, 2025 at 3:12 AM
Not arguing, but that's less like a bribe & more like a ransom.
Nice to hear from you again. Thanks for writing.
April 11, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Nice to hear from you again. Thanks for writing.
NCAA rules allow almost *anyone* to participate in men's sports.
Women, trans are both welcome. No complaint from me.
In order for you to have your way, we can just eliminate the separate women's category completely. Are you OK with that?
Women, trans are both welcome. No complaint from me.
In order for you to have your way, we can just eliminate the separate women's category completely. Are you OK with that?
April 11, 2025 at 4:05 PM
NCAA rules allow almost *anyone* to participate in men's sports.
Women, trans are both welcome. No complaint from me.
In order for you to have your way, we can just eliminate the separate women's category completely. Are you OK with that?
Women, trans are both welcome. No complaint from me.
In order for you to have your way, we can just eliminate the separate women's category completely. Are you OK with that?
The entire 40 minute segment didn't provide any actual proof supporting its arguments. Its consistent theme was the people who disagree are bad.
April 11, 2025 at 11:54 AM
The entire 40 minute segment didn't provide any actual proof supporting its arguments. Its consistent theme was the people who disagree are bad.
Your argument is incredibly weak. Also, hugely unpopular.
Presented opponents who are disliked. Couldn't find any supporters that people like.
You will never win this one, but you can keep on whining, which seems likely.
Or you can find a cause where you might be successful.
Presented opponents who are disliked. Couldn't find any supporters that people like.
You will never win this one, but you can keep on whining, which seems likely.
Or you can find a cause where you might be successful.
April 11, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Your argument is incredibly weak. Also, hugely unpopular.
Presented opponents who are disliked. Couldn't find any supporters that people like.
You will never win this one, but you can keep on whining, which seems likely.
Or you can find a cause where you might be successful.
Presented opponents who are disliked. Couldn't find any supporters that people like.
You will never win this one, but you can keep on whining, which seems likely.
Or you can find a cause where you might be successful.
Good one. Took words out context to make your point.
April 10, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Good one. Took words out context to make your point.
I watched it.
The episode consisted entirely of textbook fallacious arguments. Ad hominem attack, straw-man, what-aboutism, etc.
I was surprised the audience applauded such weak rhetoric.
Didn't disclose much of the content came from a trans staff member.
The episode consisted entirely of textbook fallacious arguments. Ad hominem attack, straw-man, what-aboutism, etc.
I was surprised the audience applauded such weak rhetoric.
Didn't disclose much of the content came from a trans staff member.
April 10, 2025 at 3:05 PM
I watched it.
The episode consisted entirely of textbook fallacious arguments. Ad hominem attack, straw-man, what-aboutism, etc.
I was surprised the audience applauded such weak rhetoric.
Didn't disclose much of the content came from a trans staff member.
The episode consisted entirely of textbook fallacious arguments. Ad hominem attack, straw-man, what-aboutism, etc.
I was surprised the audience applauded such weak rhetoric.
Didn't disclose much of the content came from a trans staff member.
Are you a libertarian in all contexts, or only when it supports your agenda ?
April 10, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Are you a libertarian in all contexts, or only when it supports your agenda ?
Whoever approved XY males in women's sports started this. There is no burden of proof in elections. Easy to say Republicans used this matter unfairly. I see it as the Democrats stupidly giving them the opportunity.
April 10, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Whoever approved XY males in women's sports started this. There is no burden of proof in elections. Easy to say Republicans used this matter unfairly. I see it as the Democrats stupidly giving them the opportunity.
If the examples are so obscure, then it's right to call out John Oliver, et all, for pursuing this matter.
April 10, 2025 at 12:01 PM
If the examples are so obscure, then it's right to call out John Oliver, et all, for pursuing this matter.
Was asking the person for their opinion.
April 10, 2025 at 11:55 AM
Was asking the person for their opinion.
Lance Armstrong, Mike Johnson. Easy villains.
Notice you didn't use any input from Martin Navratilova. That would have eliminated a good part of your argument.
Notice you didn't use any input from Martin Navratilova. That would have eliminated a good part of your argument.
April 10, 2025 at 4:34 AM
Lance Armstrong, Mike Johnson. Easy villains.
Notice you didn't use any input from Martin Navratilova. That would have eliminated a good part of your argument.
Notice you didn't use any input from Martin Navratilova. That would have eliminated a good part of your argument.
That's original. Notice you didn't answer my question.
April 10, 2025 at 12:42 AM
That's original. Notice you didn't answer my question.
So, is there any need for a separate women's category in sports? If yes, should there be any rules to qualify trans-women?
April 9, 2025 at 4:21 PM
So, is there any need for a separate women's category in sports? If yes, should there be any rules to qualify trans-women?