It literally hasn't, plenty of things about human biology let alone male and female biology was unknown thousands of years ago. Not one person was talking about say chromosomes back then. It was even more socially constructed than it is now.

First of all it's probably not even that simple if you dig into that subject, second of all you know you don't look at people's bones to figure out their gender or even sex, so it's an irrelevant point.

So again you're not citing science. Just stop saying you are lmao

Yea this is how I know you've never read a biology textbook in your life. Science tells you it's not as simple as "men parts" and "women parts".
Human history? Are you citing natural science or the *opinions* of humans historically? These are very different.

What science are you citing exactly? I can find science books all the way back from the 70's saying even biological sex and gender in humans isn't that simple.

Naw they're women.
If you want to argue what someone "starts as" is what defines them, then we all "started" as a single-cell organism some billions of years ago that began replicating. Who cares? No one looks at a person and thinks "hmm what did they start as? Have to know before using pronouns!"

Read something sometime lmao. Literally anything.

Are women so foreign to you that you need a definition for extraterrestrials? lmao
'Sides for all you know people on that other planet could be reproducing asexually and have no clue what all this nonsense about "man" and "woman" is all about.

Socially constructed category partly grounded in biology and partly in cultural roles, expectations and ideals. Sometimes one more than the other depending on societal-historical context.
Same with "man".

Oh look an unflattering photo. I wonder if any woman ever has had that.

You said it was about testicles. So I guess that's not it then? What is it then? What is a woman?

In that case women git good. Skill issue that men apparently look better.

So if they don't have testicles, they are women? Transwomen are women if they get bottom-surgery?

So are men with no testicles necessarily women?

It's a woman. But also, if it's such a problem, women could just get better at doing the woman-thing. Kind of embarrassing "men" do it better no?

It's a woman. But also, if it's such a problem, women could just get better at doing the woman-thing. Kind of embarrassing "men" do it better no?

The real patriot would be Joe if he chose to finally try out that new presidential immunity ruling.
Lotta fun stuff he could be doing with that.
In video games.

I mean

Peak episodes are those that lure you in with "omg what if technology" but then lowkey turns out it's not really about "what if this tech?" but rather "what if this tech (that we already have) and *people become willing to use it like this*?". One exception might be the bee episode. I like that one.