Strange, the argument that the reviewers make is that their biased actions would create a more balanced field while empirical analyses show that the field is dominated by non-positivistic research journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/...

Super nuttig onderzoeksproject, ik kijk uit naar je bevindingen, gefeliciteerd!

Hi:)! For great memes (and good content) I recommend @johnholbein1.bsky.social

I think that it would be good if reviews also included a systematic review of previous reviews on the topic (because single reviews are often incomplete, and because it can otherwise be claimed that things have not been studied before based on a review of only recent lit). What do you think?

Some thoughts after reading the slides: Systematic literature reviews are more clear about their scope, but for readers it is still hard to discern whether this scope is complete.

Thanks for sharing this presentation, it was a real eye-opener to me.. I always do try to provide an impartial overview, but I have been guilty of claiming that whatever I was introducing was understudied or that certain evidence was lacking. Will be more careful about this moving forward!