And some contestants actually used spell-checkers!!! (or have we moved out of the 1980s yet?)

You might like to see my just-published paper on AI and the Death of the Academic Author. doi.org/10.1080/0142...

Are you really describing Geoffrey Hinton as an "incompetent #AI "inventor""?

"Technology is meant to serve the people, not replace them." And who, exactly, decided that?

Ethical AI requires good information. How about Step 1: Open the Vatican Archives to all AI models for training, free of charge. Steps 2 and 3 will take care of themselves.

Many people (despite their claims) can't consistently drive safely, as indicated by the number of MVAs each year. Replacing them with driverless cars will help. The driverless car does not have to be 100%; it just has to be "average" and that would make it safer than 50% of all drivers.

Perhaps if #AI had written that article, it would have been worth reading. 5 minutes stolen from my life :-(.

Well, the first problem you need to fix is your keyboard :-(.

Our track record so far, unfortunately, indicates that AI has a better chance. Even if AI's chance is 1%, it's better than we're doing.

No, and it was a first-time author (Not American), so I don't wish to name them publicly.

The author did not use quotation marks when characters were having a conversation, and gave no indication of who was speaking. It was impossible to follow. After 4 or 5 pages, I could not take it anymore. The only time I have physically thrown a book across the room.

The AMEE (Association for Medical Education in Europe) places a limit on presenters, but not on authors. This also helps a lot with logistics when running multiple streams.

Why are you
writing such
short lines?

Please
write longer lines so that they can be easily read.

(Breaking sentences over several lines does not make it a poem).