Aurora
@iris11-86.bsky.social
Not whipping votes against the funding is a failure of leadership.
And Schumer’s do-nothing posture in the Senate is inexcusable.
These are not the leaders we need in a moment of existential danger.
And Schumer’s do-nothing posture in the Senate is inexcusable.
These are not the leaders we need in a moment of existential danger.
January 22, 2026 at 12:39 AM
Not whipping votes against the funding is a failure of leadership.
And Schumer’s do-nothing posture in the Senate is inexcusable.
These are not the leaders we need in a moment of existential danger.
And Schumer’s do-nothing posture in the Senate is inexcusable.
These are not the leaders we need in a moment of existential danger.
We already have Alaska — vast, cold, remote, underused.
The idea that we “need” Greenland is pure imperial fantasy, not strategy.
Most Americans don’t even visit the cold territory we already own.
The idea that we “need” Greenland is pure imperial fantasy, not strategy.
Most Americans don’t even visit the cold territory we already own.
January 22, 2026 at 12:36 AM
We already have Alaska — vast, cold, remote, underused.
The idea that we “need” Greenland is pure imperial fantasy, not strategy.
Most Americans don’t even visit the cold territory we already own.
The idea that we “need” Greenland is pure imperial fantasy, not strategy.
Most Americans don’t even visit the cold territory we already own.
Queens needs democratic socialists who truly fight for the working class.
January 22, 2026 at 12:34 AM
Queens needs democratic socialists who truly fight for the working class.
“Yeah, I get that. This term is on a whole different level of bad, so keeping it simple makes sense. They’ve been awful, no question — but at least this is something. Better than total silence.”
January 22, 2026 at 12:26 AM
“Yeah, I get that. This term is on a whole different level of bad, so keeping it simple makes sense. They’ve been awful, no question — but at least this is something. Better than total silence.”
Nailing him on some technical side charge would miss the point.
He needs to be removed for attacking the constitutional order itself — so it sets a real deterrent.
Otherwise the message is: break democracy, just don’t mess up your paperwork.
He needs to be removed for attacking the constitutional order itself — so it sets a real deterrent.
Otherwise the message is: break democracy, just don’t mess up your paperwork.
January 21, 2026 at 9:37 PM
Nailing him on some technical side charge would miss the point.
He needs to be removed for attacking the constitutional order itself — so it sets a real deterrent.
Otherwise the message is: break democracy, just don’t mess up your paperwork.
He needs to be removed for attacking the constitutional order itself — so it sets a real deterrent.
Otherwise the message is: break democracy, just don’t mess up your paperwork.
There’s zero evidence he’s snorting cocaine. Saying that turns a real critique into tabloid nonsense and weakens the argument.
January 21, 2026 at 9:36 PM
There’s zero evidence he’s snorting cocaine. Saying that turns a real critique into tabloid nonsense and weakens the argument.
No.
“Good dictator” is a contradiction.
Dictators rule by repression, violence, and fear.
If someone looks “good,” it’s because the brutality is being ignored or sanitized.
“Good dictator” is a contradiction.
Dictators rule by repression, violence, and fear.
If someone looks “good,” it’s because the brutality is being ignored or sanitized.
January 21, 2026 at 9:33 PM
No.
“Good dictator” is a contradiction.
Dictators rule by repression, violence, and fear.
If someone looks “good,” it’s because the brutality is being ignored or sanitized.
“Good dictator” is a contradiction.
Dictators rule by repression, violence, and fear.
If someone looks “good,” it’s because the brutality is being ignored or sanitized.
He accuses others of the worst things because those are the things he’s willing to do himself.
When he tells you who he is, believe him.
When he tells you who he is, believe him.
January 21, 2026 at 9:30 PM
He accuses others of the worst things because those are the things he’s willing to do himself.
When he tells you who he is, believe him.
When he tells you who he is, believe him.
Texas refineries rely on Canadian heavy fuel oil because it's cheap, reliable, and directly connected via pipelines.The argument that "a change of government will rearrange the supply chain" is fundamentally flawed in terms of cost and risk.
January 21, 2026 at 3:48 PM
Texas refineries rely on Canadian heavy fuel oil because it's cheap, reliable, and directly connected via pipelines.The argument that "a change of government will rearrange the supply chain" is fundamentally flawed in terms of cost and risk.
The statement "Nostalgia is not a strategy" is incredibly apt. The world has changed. Failing to address reality and act collectively will only lead to being picked off one by one by powerful nations. What democratic countries lack now is not slogans, but clarity and unity.
January 20, 2026 at 9:10 PM
The statement "Nostalgia is not a strategy" is incredibly apt. The world has changed. Failing to address reality and act collectively will only lead to being picked off one by one by powerful nations. What democratic countries lack now is not slogans, but clarity and unity.