Not sure whether autocorrect has done it again, or the second "no" is an intentional joke....

This shows humanity in a leader.

Wasn't the US also big on "Personal Responsibility"?

If they regret it, that is then on their own personal responsibility.

Imagine if Canada would buy all of that...

And now a serious answer.

Again, missing the point.

What do you think Chesh' post initially is about? What message does she want to convey?

Yeah, I wonder too... Why are you posting things that are not relevant?

The distances aren't really a problem though. In Europe, we had the Nordstream 1 and 2, which went from the coast of Russia, to northern Germany. These were underwater, which added complexity that Canada doesn't have.

These things can be done.

And you no tag me?!!?
*swoons*

This is one of my favourite stories.

Actually, here in Europe that is largely how it is done. We built the infrastructure first and then build the rest.

Which is why there is even talks about that pipeline, even if it never gets actually built. There has been talks about it by the conservatives even before they last were in power.

It has been a talking point again in the last elections. By actually making progression here, they remove that point.

When building cities, you want to have the infrastructure there first. You build the roads, the busstops, the trainstation etc. all before there are actual people living and businesses operating there.

These pipelines operate in a similar manner. By building them first, you create incentives.

But I see 10 crisps...

Well... no. Considering that the chimpanzee Y-chromosome is about half the size of a human Y-chromosome. So, on that technicality it would actually make more sense for women to be more genetically alike to the chimpanzee.

Albeit, evolutionary speaking it makes no difference.

ft. @chesh.bsky.social