Celinda Lake blames (1) the influence of corporate-aligned donors (2) that moderation feels safe and instinctive for many leaders (3) failure to understand (and compete with) the appeal of right-wing populism.
Celinda Lake blames (1) the influence of corporate-aligned donors (2) that moderation feels safe and instinctive for many leaders (3) failure to understand (and compete with) the appeal of right-wing populism.
They want policy that’s big, immediately impactful, and fits the scale of their struggles (which is not to say that we can’t pursue other slower burning policy change as well).
They want policy that’s big, immediately impactful, and fits the scale of their struggles (which is not to say that we can’t pursue other slower burning policy change as well).
But it was still popular. They had made Republicans attack them on a popular policy - which is what you want!
But it was still popular. They had made Republicans attack them on a popular policy - which is what you want!
Voters continued to support it, even as republicans attacked it (heat which actually helped voters learn about it!)
But the Harris campaign flinched and dropped the gouging messaging in favour of milquetoast platitudes (and saw their support drop after).
Voters continued to support it, even as republicans attacked it (heat which actually helped voters learn about it!)
But the Harris campaign flinched and dropped the gouging messaging in favour of milquetoast platitudes (and saw their support drop after).
When we deride bold policies as “unrealistic” or “unaffordable,” swing voters hear “bullshit.”
They believe:
1) Trump is delivering the unimaginable daily;
2) Taxing the rich + corporations would pay for it.
When we deride bold policies as “unrealistic” or “unaffordable,” swing voters hear “bullshit.”
They believe:
1) Trump is delivering the unimaginable daily;
2) Taxing the rich + corporations would pay for it.