Jay Patel
banner
infotainment.bsky.social
Jay Patel
@infotainment.bsky.social
🎷 vibe adulting

#HCI #PeerReview #SciPub
#toolsforthought #ResearchSynthesis
#OpenScience #MetaSci #FoSci

🔎 Research: ethnography of peer review
🧑‍🏫 Teaching: Stats, DataViz

🐢 UMD: College of Info
🌐 PhD Candidate: Info Studies / HCI + Data
🏝️ OASISlab
"PUNCTUATION GOES INSIDE THE QUOTATION MARKS". --- Roxane Gay

Got it!
November 11, 2025 at 2:50 AM
Do you post on PubPeer ever?
November 10, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Alive as are the paintings in the Harry Potter books
November 10, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Any trends by disciplines broadly?
November 10, 2025 at 7:13 PM
What are the stats on ORCID use across all published papers over the last few years? Surely, it's above 50%?
November 10, 2025 at 4:25 PM
In a candy store, ad for Schroedinger's KitKat
November 7, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Yeah, Gelman has observed the same on his blog. I'd love to see a content analysis and critical analysis of such error statements. That'd make for a nice study.
November 7, 2025 at 2:42 AM
I confess to this type of dunking, but isn't it easy enough to email a colleague on one's campus or run a search with varied keywords with the help of a friendly librarian? And if I may cautiously suggest the use AI-assisted search engines like Elicit...
November 5, 2025 at 11:20 PM
@pekka.bsky.social Yet another example of the sleuthing-scicomm divide for you to examine.
November 5, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Mirroring my earlier thread for critical examination of the stem cell paper:

bsky.app/profile/info...
Hey, @gracewade.bsky.social why is this article continuously posted on BSky? The number of issues documented by academic researchers is worth reporting.

The story should be one of errors/potential fraud instead of a breakthrough, right?

pubpeer.com/publications...

Author reply in the thread:
November 5, 2025 at 9:56 PM
And just over the past day or so, even more commentary point to conflict of interest issues (didn't declare a key patent) and issues with changing the clinical trial registration dates to make it seem as if the data were collected after declaring the study plan/registration.
November 5, 2025 at 9:55 PM
And for context, here are the sleuths' profiles in other outlets:

www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/r...

www.zmescience.com/science/the-...

These people are pros.
Retraction, She Wrote: Dorothy Bishop’s life after research
A renowned researcher’s eye for detail has given her a second career and a new following.
www.thetransmitter.org
November 5, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Hey, @gracewade.bsky.social why is this article continuously posted on BSky? The number of issues documented by academic researchers is worth reporting.

The story should be one of errors/potential fraud instead of a breakthrough, right?

pubpeer.com/publications...

Author reply in the thread:
November 5, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Ah, but that's not ideal for the user if they have a direction they want to pursue. Maybe I'll contrast its performance against a general-purpose LLM with specific prompting and see the differences.
November 4, 2025 at 11:05 PM
I really, really want to figure out ways to amplify the critical commenters so they dominate the news stream. But how?
November 4, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Agreed, I've been toying with the idea of doing something in this scicomm space. Think a daily Snopes crossed with PubPeer for research communication. Hoping there's a biz model behind it somewhere.
November 4, 2025 at 9:10 PM
And editors' unique value add can be to specify/ideate the specific subtasks that LLMs can and should perform (ones humans are poor at and/or averse to completing).
November 4, 2025 at 8:25 PM
So how did you prompt it then? Typically, prompts starting with "You are an expert X with expertise in domains A,B, and C..." is effective.

The Google white paper that was published a while ago can be helpful: cloud.google.com/discover/wha...

Section: Strategies for writing better prompts
November 4, 2025 at 8:22 PM
A modern remake would be really something.
November 4, 2025 at 7:57 PM